Investigation of precision sound velocity measurement methods as reference for ultrasonic gas flow meters

Petter Norli, P. Lunde, M. Vestrheim, Christian Michelsen
{"title":"Investigation of precision sound velocity measurement methods as reference for ultrasonic gas flow meters","authors":"Petter Norli, P. Lunde, M. Vestrheim, Christian Michelsen","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultrasonic gas flow meters for volumetric flow rate fiscal metering of natural gas (USMs) may possibly also be used for mass and energy flow rate measurement, partially based on velocity of sound (VOS) measurement. To establish the accuracy of the VOS measurements given by the USM, and for traceability purposes, an independent and high-accuracy VOS measurement cell may be used as reference. To include relevant effects of dispersion, the cell should preferably work in the operational frequency range of USMs, e.g. 100-200 kHz, with natural gas under high pressure. Three different transient methods are investigated, aiming to realize a VOS measurement cell, and they are seen to have several common experimental uncertainty sources. In the present work, a two-distance method is discussed in more detail as an example, and some results from measurements in an insulated chamber with air at 1 atm and ca. 25 ◦ C are presented. The relative expanded measurement uncertainty was estimated according to ISO guidelines to 282 ppm (95 % conf. level). One major source of measurement uncertainty was experienced to be small convection currents in the chamber. Without these, the expanded uncertainty would have been about 162 ppm. Such convection effects are expected to be strongly reduced in a properly designed measurement cell. The VOS measurement results were compared with predictions from a VOS model for standard air, including dispersion (J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 93 (5), pp. 2510-2516, 1993), resulting in a mean deviation of -18 ppm with a two standard deviation spread in the data of 190 ppm over the temperature range.","PeriodicalId":302030,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Ultrasonic gas flow meters for volumetric flow rate fiscal metering of natural gas (USMs) may possibly also be used for mass and energy flow rate measurement, partially based on velocity of sound (VOS) measurement. To establish the accuracy of the VOS measurements given by the USM, and for traceability purposes, an independent and high-accuracy VOS measurement cell may be used as reference. To include relevant effects of dispersion, the cell should preferably work in the operational frequency range of USMs, e.g. 100-200 kHz, with natural gas under high pressure. Three different transient methods are investigated, aiming to realize a VOS measurement cell, and they are seen to have several common experimental uncertainty sources. In the present work, a two-distance method is discussed in more detail as an example, and some results from measurements in an insulated chamber with air at 1 atm and ca. 25 ◦ C are presented. The relative expanded measurement uncertainty was estimated according to ISO guidelines to 282 ppm (95 % conf. level). One major source of measurement uncertainty was experienced to be small convection currents in the chamber. Without these, the expanded uncertainty would have been about 162 ppm. Such convection effects are expected to be strongly reduced in a properly designed measurement cell. The VOS measurement results were compared with predictions from a VOS model for standard air, including dispersion (J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 93 (5), pp. 2510-2516, 1993), resulting in a mean deviation of -18 ppm with a two standard deviation spread in the data of 190 ppm over the temperature range.
作为超声气体流量计参考的精密声速测量方法研究
用于天然气体积流量财政计量的超声波气体流量计也可能用于质量和能量流量测量,部分基于声速(VOS)测量。为了确定USM给出的VOS测量的准确性,并为了可追溯性,可以使用独立的高精度VOS测量单元作为参考。为了包括色散的相关影响,电池最好在USMs的工作频率范围内工作,例如100-200 kHz,在高压下使用天然气。为了实现VOS测量单元,研究了三种不同的瞬态方法,发现它们有几个常见的实验不确定源。在本工作中,以双距离方法为例进行了更详细的讨论,并给出了在1 atm和约25°C的绝缘室中测量的一些结果。相对扩展测量不确定度根据ISO指南估计为282ppm(95%一致性水平)。测量不确定度的一个主要来源是实验室内的小对流。如果没有这些,扩大后的不确定性将达到162ppm左右。在适当设计的测量单元中,这种对流效应预计会大大减少。VOS测量结果与标准空气(包括弥散)的VOS模型预测结果进行了比较(J. Acoust。Soc。Amer. 93 (5), pp. 2510-2516, 1993),结果平均偏差为-18 ppm,在温度范围内190 ppm的数据中有两个标准偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信