Effects of vibrotactile signals coupled with pressure detection or timer when interacting with a touch screen in automobile

Emily Guindi, Laora Kerautret, Nour Eddine El Ouardi, Stéphanie Dabic
{"title":"Effects of vibrotactile signals coupled with pressure detection or timer when interacting with a touch screen in automobile","authors":"Emily Guindi, Laora Kerautret, Nour Eddine El Ouardi, Stéphanie Dabic","doi":"10.1145/3286689.3286707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of our study was to determine the benefit of vibrotactile feedback when interacting with the Lane Change Task (LCT) simulated driving display, but also to compare three modes of driving interaction: the pressure, the timer and the capacitive during two types of tasks: the slider and the push. The thirty-three participants were initially separated into two groups, depending on the type of task (slider or push) and thus conducted under two levels of cognitive load modulated by the OSPAN task (operation-word-span) which solicits working memory where the participant is asked to check the accuracy of a calculation or retain a word while interacting with a touch screen and performed these tasks in a driving simulator. The subjective results showed that i) for the slider, the pressure is preferred over the capacitive and timer modes. However, this is not verified for the pushes, ii) The subjective questionnaires confirmed the interest of the vibrotactile return as well in terms of preference, feeling of security and confidence regarding the touch screen. Conversely, the results obtained via the Driving Activity Load Index (DALI) questionnaire did not show any significant results.","PeriodicalId":356460,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3286689.3286707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine the benefit of vibrotactile feedback when interacting with the Lane Change Task (LCT) simulated driving display, but also to compare three modes of driving interaction: the pressure, the timer and the capacitive during two types of tasks: the slider and the push. The thirty-three participants were initially separated into two groups, depending on the type of task (slider or push) and thus conducted under two levels of cognitive load modulated by the OSPAN task (operation-word-span) which solicits working memory where the participant is asked to check the accuracy of a calculation or retain a word while interacting with a touch screen and performed these tasks in a driving simulator. The subjective results showed that i) for the slider, the pressure is preferred over the capacitive and timer modes. However, this is not verified for the pushes, ii) The subjective questionnaires confirmed the interest of the vibrotactile return as well in terms of preference, feeling of security and confidence regarding the touch screen. Conversely, the results obtained via the Driving Activity Load Index (DALI) questionnaire did not show any significant results.
振动触觉信号与压力检测或定时器在与汽车触摸屏交互时的效果
我们的研究目的是确定振动触觉反馈在与变道任务(LCT)模拟驾驶显示器交互时的好处,并比较三种驾驶交互模式:压力,计时器和电容在两种类型的任务中:滑块和推。33名参与者最初根据任务类型(滑块或推)分为两组,因此在两级认知负荷下进行,由osan任务(操作-单词-span)调节,该任务要求参与者在与触摸屏互动时检查计算的准确性或保留单词,并在驾驶模拟器中执行这些任务。主观结果表明,i)对于滑块,压力模式优于电容模式和定时器模式。ii)主观问卷调查证实了振动触觉回归的兴趣,以及对触摸屏的偏好、安全感和信心。相反,通过驾驶活动负荷指数(DALI)问卷获得的结果没有显示任何显著的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信