Sickness, Death, and Survival in the Works of Gu Ding and Xiao Hong

Junko Agnew
{"title":"Sickness, Death, and Survival in the Works of Gu Ding and Xiao Hong","authors":"Junko Agnew","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv12fw77c.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how Chinese intellectuals of contrasting political agendas reacted to Manchukuo’s biopolitical regime within literary works. Gu Ding, who worked closely with the Japanese, regarded imperialism as a means of salvation for a sick China, while Xiao Hong, who opposed imperialism, treated the Japanese as just another disease inflicting the body politic. Although clear differences emerge in Gu and Xiao Hong’s perceptions of imperialism, comparisons of their works reveal similarities in depicting the socially constructed nature of sickness. In Gu’s story, the Japanese manufacture the terror caused by epidemic disease, while in Xiao Hong’s text, a village community's power holders define illness. Sickness may emerge naturally, but as revealed in literary narratives, its identification becomes an arena for political, economical, and social conflicts.","PeriodicalId":244888,"journal":{"name":"Manchukuo Perspectives","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manchukuo Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12fw77c.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines how Chinese intellectuals of contrasting political agendas reacted to Manchukuo’s biopolitical regime within literary works. Gu Ding, who worked closely with the Japanese, regarded imperialism as a means of salvation for a sick China, while Xiao Hong, who opposed imperialism, treated the Japanese as just another disease inflicting the body politic. Although clear differences emerge in Gu and Xiao Hong’s perceptions of imperialism, comparisons of their works reveal similarities in depicting the socially constructed nature of sickness. In Gu’s story, the Japanese manufacture the terror caused by epidemic disease, while in Xiao Hong’s text, a village community's power holders define illness. Sickness may emerge naturally, but as revealed in literary narratives, its identification becomes an arena for political, economical, and social conflicts.
顾鼎、萧红作品中的疾病、死亡与生存
本章考察了政治议程截然不同的中国知识分子如何在文学作品中对满洲国的生物政治政权作出反应。与日本人密切合作的顾鼎,将帝国主义视为拯救病态中国的手段,而反对帝国主义的萧红,则将日本人视为另一种强加于国家的疾病。尽管顾和萧红对帝国主义的看法存在明显差异,但比较他们的作品,可以发现他们在描绘疾病的社会建构本质方面的相似之处。在顾的故事中,日本人制造了由流行病引起的恐怖,而在萧红的文本中,一个村庄社区的掌权者定义了疾病。疾病可能是自然出现的,但正如文学叙事所揭示的那样,疾病的识别成为政治、经济和社会冲突的舞台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信