Coda

Carolyn Vellenga Berman
{"title":"Coda","authors":"Carolyn Vellenga Berman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192845405.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Coda compares the initial excitement about the democratic possibilities of the internet in the twenty-first century—and subsequent fears concerning the political effects of social media and the resurgence of populism—with nineteenth-century responses to the proliferation of printed paper. It likens the early Victorian debates about allowing the reporting of debates to experiments with regulating communication through Twitter and Facebook. It then reveals how recent events have refocused our attention on both representative democracy and the book as fragile formations. It links recent proposals for adjusting the effects of social media to Dickens’s own efforts on copyright. Finally, it shows how Dickens’s satirical proposals anticipated dystopian aspects of our current world of smartphones and the attention economy.","PeriodicalId":197214,"journal":{"name":"Dickens and Democracy in the Age of Paper","volume":"66 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dickens and Democracy in the Age of Paper","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845405.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Coda compares the initial excitement about the democratic possibilities of the internet in the twenty-first century—and subsequent fears concerning the political effects of social media and the resurgence of populism—with nineteenth-century responses to the proliferation of printed paper. It likens the early Victorian debates about allowing the reporting of debates to experiments with regulating communication through Twitter and Facebook. It then reveals how recent events have refocused our attention on both representative democracy and the book as fragile formations. It links recent proposals for adjusting the effects of social media to Dickens’s own efforts on copyright. Finally, it shows how Dickens’s satirical proposals anticipated dystopian aspects of our current world of smartphones and the attention economy.
Coda
结尾处将最初对21世纪互联网的民主可能性的兴奋,以及随后对社交媒体的政治影响和民粹主义复苏的担忧,与19世纪对印刷纸扩散的反应进行了比较。它将维多利亚时代早期关于允许报道辩论的辩论比作通过Twitter和Facebook规范交流的实验。然后,它揭示了最近的事件是如何将我们的注意力重新集中到代议制民主和作为脆弱形态的书籍上的。它将最近关于调整社交媒体影响的建议与狄更斯自己在版权方面的努力联系起来。最后,它展示了狄更斯的讽刺建议是如何预见到我们当今世界的反乌托邦方面的智能手机和注意力经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信