Post exposure prophylaxis for occupational and non occupational exposure to HIV in a tertiary care hospital in central Nepal

Rakshya Shrestha, Sashi Sharma, P. Khadga, M. Sayami, U. Chitrakar, G. Dhungana
{"title":"Post exposure prophylaxis for occupational and non occupational exposure to HIV in a tertiary care hospital in central Nepal","authors":"Rakshya Shrestha, Sashi Sharma, P. Khadga, M. Sayami, U. Chitrakar, G. Dhungana","doi":"10.3126/JAIM.V7I2.23488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to HIV is the short term use of prescribed dose of antiretroviral therapy among persons exposed to high risk behaviors in order to prevent them from HIV infection. While occupationally exposed cases among health care workers are the major target of PEP, it is equally applicable to non occupational exposure to HIV including sexually exposed cases. This study was carried out to know the current scenario of PEP for HIV in terms of various determinants/ risk factors and outcomes of HIV positivity after prophylaxis. \nMethods: A prospective study was carried out by Antiretroviral therapy center of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital. The study period was between August 2006 and September 2016. Altogether 50 cases exposed to known HIV seropositive persons were included in this study. \nResults: The majority of the occupationally exposures were interns (48.6%), followed by staff nurse (18.9%), CMLT student (13.5%), hospital staff (10.8%) and resident doctor (8.1%). Majority (70.3%) were exposed to needle prick injury. Six-month follow-up showed zero seroconversion for HIV ELISA among the exposed cases. \nConclusion: Intern constituted the greater proportion of health care workers exposed to accidental needle stick injury. Timely administration of prophylaxis might have resulted zero seroconversion for HIV ELISA among the exposed cases.","PeriodicalId":374721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JAIM.V7I2.23488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to HIV is the short term use of prescribed dose of antiretroviral therapy among persons exposed to high risk behaviors in order to prevent them from HIV infection. While occupationally exposed cases among health care workers are the major target of PEP, it is equally applicable to non occupational exposure to HIV including sexually exposed cases. This study was carried out to know the current scenario of PEP for HIV in terms of various determinants/ risk factors and outcomes of HIV positivity after prophylaxis. Methods: A prospective study was carried out by Antiretroviral therapy center of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital. The study period was between August 2006 and September 2016. Altogether 50 cases exposed to known HIV seropositive persons were included in this study. Results: The majority of the occupationally exposures were interns (48.6%), followed by staff nurse (18.9%), CMLT student (13.5%), hospital staff (10.8%) and resident doctor (8.1%). Majority (70.3%) were exposed to needle prick injury. Six-month follow-up showed zero seroconversion for HIV ELISA among the exposed cases. Conclusion: Intern constituted the greater proportion of health care workers exposed to accidental needle stick injury. Timely administration of prophylaxis might have resulted zero seroconversion for HIV ELISA among the exposed cases.
尼泊尔中部一家三级保健医院职业和非职业接触艾滋病毒的接触后预防
HIV暴露后预防(PEP)是指在暴露于高危行为的人群中短期使用规定剂量的抗逆转录病毒治疗,以防止他们感染HIV。虽然卫生保健工作者中的职业接触病例是PEP的主要目标,但它同样适用于非职业接触艾滋病毒,包括性接触病例。本研究的目的是了解艾滋病毒PEP的现状,包括各种决定因素/危险因素以及预防后艾滋病毒阳性的结果。方法:在特里布万大学教学医院抗逆转录病毒治疗中心进行前瞻性研究。研究期间为2006年8月至2016年9月。共有50例暴露于已知HIV血清阳性的人纳入本研究。结果:以实习生(48.6%)为主,其次为护士长(18.9%)、CMLT学生(13.5%)、医院工作人员(10.8%)和住院医生(8.1%)。大多数(70.3%)暴露于针刺损伤。六个月的随访显示,暴露病例的HIV ELISA血清转化为零。结论:实习医务人员在意外针刺伤害中所占比例较大。及时给予预防可能导致暴露病例中HIV ELISA血清转化为零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信