Are Double-Layer Stents Better than Plastic Stents and Self-Expandable MetalStents in Palliating Malignant Biliary Obstruction? Meta-Analysis andSystematic Review

Harsha Moole, Matthew L Bechtold, Micheal D Cashman, Fritz-Henry Volmar, S. Dhillon, D. Forcione, S. Puli
{"title":"Are Double-Layer Stents Better than Plastic Stents and Self-Expandable MetalStents in Palliating Malignant Biliary Obstruction? Meta-Analysis andSystematic Review","authors":"Harsha Moole, Matthew L Bechtold, Micheal D Cashman, Fritz-Henry Volmar, S. Dhillon, D. Forcione, S. Puli","doi":"10.4172/2161-069X.1000459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Double layer stents (DLS) were designed to overcome the limitations of plastic stents (PS) and self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in palliating inoperable malignant biliary obstructions (MBO). Aims: Primary outcomes are stent patency period, occlusion rates and adverse events. Methods: Study Selection Criteria: Studies using DLS, SEMS and PS for palliation of patients with inoperable MBO. Data collection and extraction: Articles were searched in Pubmed and Ovid. Statistical method: Pooled proportions were calculated using both fixed and random effects model. Results: Initial search identified 374 reference articles, of which 41 were selected and reviewed. Five studies (N=460) for DLS, SEMS and PS which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled analysis by fixed effects showed DLS patency to be 118.9 days (95% CI=110.4 to 127.4) compared to 77.4 days (95% CI=70.2 to 84.6) in PS and 170.7 days (95% CI=154.4 to 187.0) in SEMS. Stent occlusion rates in DLS, PS and SEMS group were 8.1% (95% CI=7.1 to 9.0), 37.5% (95% CI=33.8 to 41.1) and 19.9% (95% CI=18.1 to 21.7) respectively. Conclusions: In palliating inoperable MBO patients, DLS seem to be superior to PS. SEMS tend to have higher occlusion rates compared to DLS.","PeriodicalId":388922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Digestive System","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Digestive System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-069X.1000459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Double layer stents (DLS) were designed to overcome the limitations of plastic stents (PS) and self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in palliating inoperable malignant biliary obstructions (MBO). Aims: Primary outcomes are stent patency period, occlusion rates and adverse events. Methods: Study Selection Criteria: Studies using DLS, SEMS and PS for palliation of patients with inoperable MBO. Data collection and extraction: Articles were searched in Pubmed and Ovid. Statistical method: Pooled proportions were calculated using both fixed and random effects model. Results: Initial search identified 374 reference articles, of which 41 were selected and reviewed. Five studies (N=460) for DLS, SEMS and PS which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled analysis by fixed effects showed DLS patency to be 118.9 days (95% CI=110.4 to 127.4) compared to 77.4 days (95% CI=70.2 to 84.6) in PS and 170.7 days (95% CI=154.4 to 187.0) in SEMS. Stent occlusion rates in DLS, PS and SEMS group were 8.1% (95% CI=7.1 to 9.0), 37.5% (95% CI=33.8 to 41.1) and 19.9% (95% CI=18.1 to 21.7) respectively. Conclusions: In palliating inoperable MBO patients, DLS seem to be superior to PS. SEMS tend to have higher occlusion rates compared to DLS.
双层支架在缓解恶性胆道梗阻方面是否优于塑料支架和自膨胀金属支架?荟萃分析和系统评价
背景:双层支架(DLS)的设计是为了克服塑料支架(PS)和自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)在缓解无法手术的恶性胆道阻塞(MBO)方面的局限性。目的:主要结局是支架通畅时间、闭塞率和不良事件。方法:研究选择标准:应用DLS、SEMS和PS对无法手术的MBO患者进行缓解的研究。数据收集和提取:在Pubmed和Ovid中检索文章。统计方法:采用固定效应和随机效应模型计算合并比例。结果:初步检索到文献374篇,筛选出41篇。本分析纳入了5项符合纳入标准的DLS、SEMS和PS研究(N=460)。固定效应的合并分析显示,DLS通畅度为118.9天(95% CI=110.4至127.4),而PS为77.4天(95% CI=70.2至84.6),SEMS为170.7天(95% CI=154.4至187.0)。DLS组、PS组和SEMS组支架闭塞率分别为8.1% (95% CI=7.1 ~ 9.0)、37.5% (95% CI=33.8 ~ 41.1)和19.9% (95% CI=18.1 ~ 21.7)。结论:在缓解无法手术的MBO患者中,DLS似乎优于PS。SEMS比DLS有更高的闭塞率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书