Affirmative Action for Muslims in the Indian Jurisprudential, Social, Economic and Political Context: A Constitutional Conundrum?

R. Sharma, Rajarshi Sen, A. Ramanujan
{"title":"Affirmative Action for Muslims in the Indian Jurisprudential, Social, Economic and Political Context: A Constitutional Conundrum?","authors":"R. Sharma, Rajarshi Sen, A. Ramanujan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1231243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India, due to its uniquely multicultural history, has for long cherished the ideal of \"Unity in Diversity\", believing in the value of an egalitarian social order within a tolerant pluralistic framework. Recently, however, the controversial Sachar Committee Report has revealed the appallingly widespread social, economic and educational backwardness of the Muslim community in India: their minimal access to education, their abysmal representation in public services, and their consequent ghettoization and alienation from the national socio-economic mainstream. Affirmative Action, in various forms, including (but not limited to) Reservations, the Report suggests, is the means of addressing this socio-economic problem by enhancing diversity in the educational and public service landscape of the national mainstream.While proponents have argued that the same will reaffirm and invigorate the egalitarian and multicultural nature of the secular Indian polity, opponents have used the same secular paradigm of the Indian Constitution to challenge the Report's proposals, on the basis that the same would be violative of the Constitutional prohibition on discrimination on the basis of religion. With both sides using the rhetoric of the Constitutional ideal of secularism to pursue their own political ends, it becomes necessary to analyse the Report, and its proposals, not only in light of the Constitution, but also in light of the ideals on which it is based, in a non-partisan manner. In the above context, the proposed paper seeks to explore the nebulous precincts of the constitutionality of Affirmative Action for Muslims in India.","PeriodicalId":269513,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Law & Law of the Muslim World eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Law & Law of the Muslim World eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1231243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

India, due to its uniquely multicultural history, has for long cherished the ideal of "Unity in Diversity", believing in the value of an egalitarian social order within a tolerant pluralistic framework. Recently, however, the controversial Sachar Committee Report has revealed the appallingly widespread social, economic and educational backwardness of the Muslim community in India: their minimal access to education, their abysmal representation in public services, and their consequent ghettoization and alienation from the national socio-economic mainstream. Affirmative Action, in various forms, including (but not limited to) Reservations, the Report suggests, is the means of addressing this socio-economic problem by enhancing diversity in the educational and public service landscape of the national mainstream.While proponents have argued that the same will reaffirm and invigorate the egalitarian and multicultural nature of the secular Indian polity, opponents have used the same secular paradigm of the Indian Constitution to challenge the Report's proposals, on the basis that the same would be violative of the Constitutional prohibition on discrimination on the basis of religion. With both sides using the rhetoric of the Constitutional ideal of secularism to pursue their own political ends, it becomes necessary to analyse the Report, and its proposals, not only in light of the Constitution, but also in light of the ideals on which it is based, in a non-partisan manner. In the above context, the proposed paper seeks to explore the nebulous precincts of the constitutionality of Affirmative Action for Muslims in India.
印度法律、社会、经济和政治背景下的穆斯林平权行动:一个宪法难题?
印度由于其独特的多元文化历史,长期以来一直珍视“多样性中的统一”的理想,相信在宽容的多元化框架内建立平等主义社会秩序的价值。然而,最近备受争议的萨迦委员会报告揭示了印度穆斯林社区在社会、经济和教育方面普遍存在的令人震惊的落后状况:他们接受教育的机会极少,在公共服务领域的代表性极低,以及由此造成的种族隔离和与国家社会经济主流的疏离。报告认为,各种形式的平权行动,包括(但不限于)保留,是通过加强国家主流教育和公共服务领域的多样性来解决这一社会经济问题的手段。虽然支持者认为,报告将重申和振兴印度世俗政体的平等主义和多元文化性质,但反对者利用印度宪法中同样的世俗范式来挑战报告的建议,理由是报告的建议将违反宪法中禁止基于宗教的歧视的规定。由于双方都在使用世俗主义的宪法理想的修辞来追求自己的政治目的,因此有必要不仅根据宪法,而且根据其所依据的理想,以无党派的方式分析报告及其建议。在上述背景下,拟议的论文试图探讨印度穆斯林平权行动的合宪性的模糊区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信