DEPENDENCE OF THE PYROMETRIC MEASURING TEMPERATURE ON THE EMISSIVITY FACTOR OF OBJECTS

I. Mykytyn, Pylyp Skoropad
{"title":"DEPENDENCE OF THE PYROMETRIC MEASURING TEMPERATURE ON THE EMISSIVITY FACTOR OF OBJECTS","authors":"I. Mykytyn, Pylyp Skoropad","doi":"10.23939/ISTCMTM2019.01.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study of the dependence of the temperature determination error on the emissivity factor of materials is conducted in the paper. The mathematical models, which describe the ratio of thermodynamic temperature and measured imaginary temperatures, taking into account the emissivity factor, are analyzed. The constructions of the full radiation, brightness radiation, and spectral ratio radiation pyrometers are underpinned by the considered models. Analyzing the mathematical models of radiation thermometers (or pyrometers), one can observe a fundamental circumstance that interferes with the wide application of pyrometry, namely, lack of knowledge or even the mere absence of information on the true numerical values of the emissivity factor of the objects. When measuring the temperature of objects that fall under the classification of “real body”, there arise serious problems with the reliability of its determination. The vast majority of modern pyrometers, which are calibrated by a blackbody, compute the data received from sensitive element of the pyrometer into temperature values, not taking into account the real value of the object’s emissivity factor. Thus, if the latter is 0.1, and the pyrometer is graded by the blackbody, then, only ~10 % of its radiation energy is perceived by sensitive element of the pyrometer. As result, the determined temperature value is substantially lower than the actual one. It can be argued that the lack of information about a real numeric value of the monitored object’s emissivity factor is the determining source of distortion of the measurement result. The problem is further complicated by the fact that the mentioned factor is the parameter that depends on many factors, and in particular on the temperature, which is exactly to define. The paper presents the results of the study of the dependence of the absolute measurement error of temperature on emissivity factor for different types of pyrometers. The accuracy of measuring the temperature with pyrometric means is minimal only for measuring the black body or gray body by the spectral ratio pyrometers. The error of measuring the temperature of real object differs significantly from the error of the black body. This is due to the ignorance of the true value of the emissivity factor of the real object. Therefore, presetting of this factor in pyrometers that is recommended by most pyrometers guidelines is completely incorrect.","PeriodicalId":415989,"journal":{"name":"Measuring Equipment and Metrology","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measuring Equipment and Metrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/ISTCMTM2019.01.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study of the dependence of the temperature determination error on the emissivity factor of materials is conducted in the paper. The mathematical models, which describe the ratio of thermodynamic temperature and measured imaginary temperatures, taking into account the emissivity factor, are analyzed. The constructions of the full radiation, brightness radiation, and spectral ratio radiation pyrometers are underpinned by the considered models. Analyzing the mathematical models of radiation thermometers (or pyrometers), one can observe a fundamental circumstance that interferes with the wide application of pyrometry, namely, lack of knowledge or even the mere absence of information on the true numerical values of the emissivity factor of the objects. When measuring the temperature of objects that fall under the classification of “real body”, there arise serious problems with the reliability of its determination. The vast majority of modern pyrometers, which are calibrated by a blackbody, compute the data received from sensitive element of the pyrometer into temperature values, not taking into account the real value of the object’s emissivity factor. Thus, if the latter is 0.1, and the pyrometer is graded by the blackbody, then, only ~10 % of its radiation energy is perceived by sensitive element of the pyrometer. As result, the determined temperature value is substantially lower than the actual one. It can be argued that the lack of information about a real numeric value of the monitored object’s emissivity factor is the determining source of distortion of the measurement result. The problem is further complicated by the fact that the mentioned factor is the parameter that depends on many factors, and in particular on the temperature, which is exactly to define. The paper presents the results of the study of the dependence of the absolute measurement error of temperature on emissivity factor for different types of pyrometers. The accuracy of measuring the temperature with pyrometric means is minimal only for measuring the black body or gray body by the spectral ratio pyrometers. The error of measuring the temperature of real object differs significantly from the error of the black body. This is due to the ignorance of the true value of the emissivity factor of the real object. Therefore, presetting of this factor in pyrometers that is recommended by most pyrometers guidelines is completely incorrect.
高温测量温度与物体发射率因子的关系
本文研究了测温误差与材料发射率因子的关系。分析了考虑发射率因素的热力学温度与实测虚温度之比的数学模型。全辐射、亮度辐射和光谱比辐射高温计的构造以所考虑的模型为基础。分析辐射温度计(或高温计)的数学模型,我们可以观察到一个干扰热法广泛应用的基本情况,即缺乏对物体发射率因子的真实数值的认识,甚至仅仅是缺乏信息。在测量属于“实物”分类的物体的温度时,其测定的可靠性存在严重问题。绝大多数由黑体校准的现代高温计,将从高温计的敏感元件接收到的数据计算成温度值,而没有考虑到物体发射系数的实际值。因此,如果后者为0.1,并且高温计被黑体分级,则其辐射能量只有~ 10%被高温计的敏感元件感知到。结果,测得的温度值大大低于实际温度值。可以认为,缺乏关于被监测对象发射率因子的真实数值的信息是测量结果失真的决定性来源。由于上述因素是取决于许多因素的参数,特别是取决于温度,这一事实使问题进一步复杂化。本文研究了不同类型高温计的温度绝对测量误差与发射率因子的关系。只有在用光谱比高温计测量黑体或灰体时,用高温法测量温度的精度才最低。测量真实物体温度的误差与测量黑体温度的误差差别很大。这是由于忽略了真实物体的发射率因子的真实值。因此,大多数高温计指南所建议的高温计中这一因素的预设是完全不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信