MEASURING TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT LEVELS: A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK TO INCORPORATE THE USER INTO MODELLING

S. Ibrahim, H. Ayad, D. Saadallah
{"title":"MEASURING TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT LEVELS: A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK TO INCORPORATE THE USER INTO MODELLING","authors":"S. Ibrahim, H. Ayad, D. Saadallah","doi":"10.2495/ut210131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, many cities have embraced the concept of transit-oriented development (TOD), as it is one of the most prominent approaches to land use and public transport integration. It is believed that measuring the existing TOD levels – ‘TOD-ness’ – of an area quantitatively is critical for TOD planning. However, a literature review reveals that spatial studies and quantitative methods that measure TOD-ness comprehensively are still limited and fragmented. Furthermore, recent research has opened the door to further investigation of methods and model development, which could bridge the gap between planning decisions and practical application. Due to the multidimensional aspects of the transport decision process and the involvement of many stakeholders, often with different points of view, the process has become more complex. Unfortunately, most of the spatial studies reviewed did not express the outcomes in terms of the impact on users, which can often prevent the realization of TOD implementation. To fill these knowledge gaps, this paper aims to suggest an integrated methodological framework that measures TOD-ness (including all stakeholders’ perceptions) and also considers the users’ opinions within their local context. The method developed extends from an existing framework commonly used by researchers, drawn from reviewing relevant studies published between 2000 and 2020. This paper reviews the studies in relation to TOD-ness measurement from a ‘methodological focus’, in which an overview of the dominant methods used is presented, in addition to their pros and cons. First, the paper introduces a theoretical review of the background of the concept, its evolution and the methods employed. An analytical review of the selected literature from different databases is then conducted. Finally, it is expected that the outcomes of the research will present the best-adopted methods and provide a developed model that measures TOD-ness quantitatively.","PeriodicalId":259696,"journal":{"name":"Urban and Maritime Transport XXVII","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban and Maritime Transport XXVII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ut210131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Worldwide, many cities have embraced the concept of transit-oriented development (TOD), as it is one of the most prominent approaches to land use and public transport integration. It is believed that measuring the existing TOD levels – ‘TOD-ness’ – of an area quantitatively is critical for TOD planning. However, a literature review reveals that spatial studies and quantitative methods that measure TOD-ness comprehensively are still limited and fragmented. Furthermore, recent research has opened the door to further investigation of methods and model development, which could bridge the gap between planning decisions and practical application. Due to the multidimensional aspects of the transport decision process and the involvement of many stakeholders, often with different points of view, the process has become more complex. Unfortunately, most of the spatial studies reviewed did not express the outcomes in terms of the impact on users, which can often prevent the realization of TOD implementation. To fill these knowledge gaps, this paper aims to suggest an integrated methodological framework that measures TOD-ness (including all stakeholders’ perceptions) and also considers the users’ opinions within their local context. The method developed extends from an existing framework commonly used by researchers, drawn from reviewing relevant studies published between 2000 and 2020. This paper reviews the studies in relation to TOD-ness measurement from a ‘methodological focus’, in which an overview of the dominant methods used is presented, in addition to their pros and cons. First, the paper introduces a theoretical review of the background of the concept, its evolution and the methods employed. An analytical review of the selected literature from different databases is then conducted. Finally, it is expected that the outcomes of the research will present the best-adopted methods and provide a developed model that measures TOD-ness quantitatively.
测量以交通为导向的发展水平:将用户纳入建模的方法框架
在世界范围内,许多城市都采用了交通导向发展(TOD)的概念,因为它是土地利用和公共交通整合的最突出方法之一。人们认为,定量地衡量一个地区现有的TOD水平——“TOD ness”——对TOD规划至关重要。然而,文献综述表明,综合测度TOD-ness的空间研究和定量方法仍然有限且支离破碎。此外,最近的研究为进一步研究方法和模型开发打开了大门,这可以弥合规划决策和实际应用之间的差距。由于运输决策过程涉及多个方面,而且涉及许多持不同观点的利益相关者,因此决策过程变得更加复杂。不幸的是,大多数被审查的空间研究都没有从对用户的影响方面表达结果,这往往会阻碍TOD实施的实现。为了填补这些知识空白,本文旨在提出一个综合的方法框架来衡量TOD-ness(包括所有利益相关者的看法),并考虑用户在当地背景下的意见。开发的方法扩展了研究人员常用的现有框架,该框架是通过回顾2000年至2020年发表的相关研究得出的。本文从方法论的角度回顾了与TOD-ness测量相关的研究,其中概述了所使用的主要方法,以及它们的优缺点。首先,本文介绍了该概念的背景,其演变和所采用的方法的理论回顾。然后对来自不同数据库的选定文献进行分析审查。最后,期望本研究的结果能够提供最佳采用的方法,并提供一个成熟的模型来定量测量TOD-ness。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信