Reflections on prevention of violent radicalization processes in the school context: An intercultural and critical approach

M. K. Rhazzali, Valentina Schiavinato
{"title":"Reflections on prevention of violent radicalization processes in the school context: An intercultural and critical approach","authors":"M. K. Rhazzali, Valentina Schiavinato","doi":"10.3280/erp1-special-2021oa12484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the issue of the prevention of violent radicalization processes (Khosrokhavar, 2014) in schools, in the Italian context, focusing on their jihadist-type declination, and it intends to propose an interpretation based on the intercultural approach (Schiavinato & Mantovani 2005; Mantovani, 2008; Schiavinato 2015) to the difference management in public contexts (Rhazzali, 2016). This perspective allows us to move the scientific debate away from the predominantly securitarian and emergency perspective, widely adopted by public policies, that removes from the political agenda the issue of an effective and fair management of cultural and religious plurality in the society and in the public space, by adopting an approach which is defined in the literature as \"policed multiculturalism\" (Ragazzi, 2015). Moreover, the securitarian discourse is a leading argument of some political parties and, encouraged by the mass media, is still dominant in common sense discourses. The intercultural perspective, on the other hand, proposes a more complex interpretation that includes not only the issue of immigration, but also allows to question the changes affecting society and everyone lives, in relation to the interconnections and exchanges that characterise the current era. It therefore considers personal and individual experience within a web of relationships co-constructed in everyday interactions, that are in turn situated in a wider social and cultural framework, which gives sense and influences them and, at the same time, is signified and influenced by them. The intercultural approach, in this respect, does not renounce taking a position of criticism and questioning of exclusion or inferiorisation dynamics, that operate both on interpersonal level and in everyday relationships, and on the broader level of the social processes that frame them.","PeriodicalId":163593,"journal":{"name":"Educational reflective practices","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational reflective practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/erp1-special-2021oa12484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the issue of the prevention of violent radicalization processes (Khosrokhavar, 2014) in schools, in the Italian context, focusing on their jihadist-type declination, and it intends to propose an interpretation based on the intercultural approach (Schiavinato & Mantovani 2005; Mantovani, 2008; Schiavinato 2015) to the difference management in public contexts (Rhazzali, 2016). This perspective allows us to move the scientific debate away from the predominantly securitarian and emergency perspective, widely adopted by public policies, that removes from the political agenda the issue of an effective and fair management of cultural and religious plurality in the society and in the public space, by adopting an approach which is defined in the literature as "policed multiculturalism" (Ragazzi, 2015). Moreover, the securitarian discourse is a leading argument of some political parties and, encouraged by the mass media, is still dominant in common sense discourses. The intercultural perspective, on the other hand, proposes a more complex interpretation that includes not only the issue of immigration, but also allows to question the changes affecting society and everyone lives, in relation to the interconnections and exchanges that characterise the current era. It therefore considers personal and individual experience within a web of relationships co-constructed in everyday interactions, that are in turn situated in a wider social and cultural framework, which gives sense and influences them and, at the same time, is signified and influenced by them. The intercultural approach, in this respect, does not renounce taking a position of criticism and questioning of exclusion or inferiorisation dynamics, that operate both on interpersonal level and in everyday relationships, and on the broader level of the social processes that frame them.
反思在学校背景下预防暴力激进化过程:一种跨文化和批判性的方法
本文讨论了在意大利背景下预防学校暴力激进化过程(Khosrokhavar, 2014)的问题,重点关注他们的圣战式衰落,并打算提出基于跨文化方法的解释(Schiavinato &多亏尤文和2005;多亏尤文和,2008;Schiavinato 2015)到公共环境中的差异管理(Rhazzali, 2016)。这一观点使我们能够将科学辩论从公共政策广泛采用的主要安全主义和紧急情况角度转移开来,通过采用文献中定义为“警察多元文化主义”的方法,将有效和公平地管理社会和公共空间中的文化和宗教多元性的问题从政治议程中移除(Ragazzi, 2015)。此外,安全主义话语是一些政党的主要论点,在大众媒体的鼓励下,在常识话语中仍然占主导地位。另一方面,跨文化视角提出了一个更复杂的解释,不仅包括移民问题,还允许质疑影响社会和每个人生活的变化,以及与当前时代特征的相互联系和交流。因此,它在日常互动中共同构建的关系网络中考虑个人和个人经验,而这些关系网络又位于更广泛的社会和文化框架中,这赋予了它们意义并影响它们,同时也被它们所表示和影响。在这方面,跨文化方法并没有放弃对排斥或劣化动态的批评和质疑,这既发生在人际层面上,也发生在日常关系中,以及更广泛的社会过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信