THARȊQAT MUNᾹQASYAT AL FIRQAH AL SHAGȊRAH WA TANFȊZUHᾹ FI TA’LȊM AL NAHWI BI MA’HAD DᾹR AL FALᾹH SEMARANG

Nur Ismah, Ahmad Maghfurin
{"title":"THARȊQAT MUNᾹQASYAT AL FIRQAH AL SHAGȊRAH WA TANFȊZUHᾹ FI TA’LȊM AL NAHWI BI MA’HAD DᾹR AL FALᾹH SEMARANG","authors":"Nur Ismah, Ahmad Maghfurin","doi":"10.35931/am.v5i3.1400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many studies show a strong relationship between teaching methods and student learning outcomes. For example, two well-known methods used to teach Arabic books in the Indonesian Pesantren are Bandongan and Sorogan. However, teaching grammar at Pesantren Dār al Falāh Semaranguses a different small group discussion method. This research seeks to examine the effectiveness of its application. This is field research using observation, interviews, and documentation. Triangulation of sources, methods, and extended times have been relied on to verify the authenticity of the data. We concluded that the application of the small group discussion was in the stages of preparation, process, and evaluation. Nevertheless, the application of this method for teaching grammar has more advantages than shortcomings, and it is fit to be used. The helpful factors are the teacher's excellent preparation, students' willingness to study the subject they will discuss within the classroom, their enthusiasm in the discussion, and the teacher's explanation at the end of the class to strengthen the understanding of the students. The obstacles are limited academic time, and the presence of students who do not have sufficient knowledge of the subject studied, leading to their lack of participation in the discussion.","PeriodicalId":112701,"journal":{"name":"Al Mi'yar: Jurnal Ilmiah Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Mi'yar: Jurnal Ilmiah Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v5i3.1400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies show a strong relationship between teaching methods and student learning outcomes. For example, two well-known methods used to teach Arabic books in the Indonesian Pesantren are Bandongan and Sorogan. However, teaching grammar at Pesantren Dār al Falāh Semaranguses a different small group discussion method. This research seeks to examine the effectiveness of its application. This is field research using observation, interviews, and documentation. Triangulation of sources, methods, and extended times have been relied on to verify the authenticity of the data. We concluded that the application of the small group discussion was in the stages of preparation, process, and evaluation. Nevertheless, the application of this method for teaching grammar has more advantages than shortcomings, and it is fit to be used. The helpful factors are the teacher's excellent preparation, students' willingness to study the subject they will discuss within the classroom, their enthusiasm in the discussion, and the teacher's explanation at the end of the class to strengthen the understanding of the students. The obstacles are limited academic time, and the presence of students who do not have sufficient knowledge of the subject studied, leading to their lack of participation in the discussion.
许多研究表明,教学方法和学生的学习成果之间存在着密切的关系。例如,印度尼西亚Pesantren中教授阿拉伯语书籍的两种众所周知的方法是Bandongan和Sorogan。然而,Pesantren Dār al Falāh semarangs的语法教学使用了一种不同的小组讨论方法。本研究旨在检验其应用的有效性。这是一种实地调查,使用观察、访谈和文献。来源、方法和延长时间的三角测量已经被用来验证数据的真实性。我们得出结论,小组讨论的应用处于准备、过程和评估阶段。然而,这种方法在语法教学中的应用利大于弊,是适合使用的。有帮助的因素是老师的出色准备,学生愿意在课堂上学习他们将要讨论的主题,他们在讨论中的热情,以及老师在课堂结束时的解释,以加强学生的理解。障碍是学习时间有限,学生对所学习的科目没有足够的知识,导致他们缺乏参与讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信