Doing Justice in Cases of Clergy Abuse of Power: A Legal Perspective

A. Underwood
{"title":"Doing Justice in Cases of Clergy Abuse of Power: A Legal Perspective","authors":"A. Underwood","doi":"10.1300/J154V05N01_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This two-part article summarizes sexual harassment law as developed from employment and educational cases since 1986. By analogy it suggests how best practices in the secular world may provide useful insights to faith communities addressing the abuse of power sexually by their clergy and lay leaders. The article proposes a model for investigating and adjudicating allegations of ethical violations. “Fair process,” rather than constitutional “due process,” is explained and advocated for faith communities. Accountability is framed in terms of restorative rather than retributive justice.","PeriodicalId":165629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Abuse","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J154V05N01_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This two-part article summarizes sexual harassment law as developed from employment and educational cases since 1986. By analogy it suggests how best practices in the secular world may provide useful insights to faith communities addressing the abuse of power sexually by their clergy and lay leaders. The article proposes a model for investigating and adjudicating allegations of ethical violations. “Fair process,” rather than constitutional “due process,” is explained and advocated for faith communities. Accountability is framed in terms of restorative rather than retributive justice.
神职人员滥用职权案件的司法公正:一个法律视角
本文分为两部分,总结了1986年以来性骚扰法律从就业和教育案例中发展而来。通过类比,它表明世俗世界的最佳实践如何为宗教团体解决神职人员和世俗领袖的性权力滥用问题提供有用的见解。本文提出了一个调查和裁决道德违规指控的模型。宗教团体解释并提倡“公平程序”,而不是宪法规定的“正当程序”。问责制的框架是恢复性正义,而不是报复性正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信