Mobile Applications for Self-Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review

Gusiella Sandra N. Garcia, D. Manlapaz, Cristine Rose S. Versales, Lyle Patrick D. Tangcuangco, Xavier Erikson V. Beltran, S. Chen, Eunice Danielle O. Florin, Kingson Kinnard Kyronne C. Li, Karen Rae G. Robles, Dale Jayson N. Sia Tan, Gail D. Valentos
{"title":"Mobile Applications for Self-Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review","authors":"Gusiella Sandra N. Garcia, D. Manlapaz, Cristine Rose S. Versales, Lyle Patrick D. Tangcuangco, Xavier Erikson V. Beltran, S. Chen, Eunice Danielle O. Florin, Kingson Kinnard Kyronne C. Li, Karen Rae G. Robles, Dale Jayson N. Sia Tan, Gail D. Valentos","doi":"10.46409/002.avip1854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To recognize and describe applications from Apple and Google geared towards the self-management of hypertension and to evaluate their quality, functionality, content validity, and usefulness. \nMethods: This is a systematic review of the mobile applications for self-management of hypertension available in the Philippines. The inclusion criteria included applications that were created within the last five years, are smartphone-based, and operate on either the Android OS or iOS. The study excluded applications that target other medical conditions, and applications that are solely for reference and clinicians’ use. Selected applications were evaluated through the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and underwent clinical guidelines compliance analysis. \nResults: A total of 1607 applications were filtered, leaving 266 applications. Twelve applications complied with the criteria, but due to inaccessibility, only four (4) were included in the study. The FITZY+ obtained the highest MARS average (4.06). Functionality domain had the highest score of more than half (3/4, 75%) of the applications. All the applications (4/4, 100%) were adherent to the treatment for hypertension in reference to the clinical guidelines.\nConclusion and Implications: Mobile health applications are promising tools, capable of minimizing the occurrence and degree of hypertension. However, the applications for self-management of hypertension are limited and of substandard quality due to inadequate information and research. Although applications satisfy some clinical guidelines, physical therapists should advise their patients not to rely solely on them as they are not the most optimal form of medical care.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.avip1854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To recognize and describe applications from Apple and Google geared towards the self-management of hypertension and to evaluate their quality, functionality, content validity, and usefulness. Methods: This is a systematic review of the mobile applications for self-management of hypertension available in the Philippines. The inclusion criteria included applications that were created within the last five years, are smartphone-based, and operate on either the Android OS or iOS. The study excluded applications that target other medical conditions, and applications that are solely for reference and clinicians’ use. Selected applications were evaluated through the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and underwent clinical guidelines compliance analysis. Results: A total of 1607 applications were filtered, leaving 266 applications. Twelve applications complied with the criteria, but due to inaccessibility, only four (4) were included in the study. The FITZY+ obtained the highest MARS average (4.06). Functionality domain had the highest score of more than half (3/4, 75%) of the applications. All the applications (4/4, 100%) were adherent to the treatment for hypertension in reference to the clinical guidelines. Conclusion and Implications: Mobile health applications are promising tools, capable of minimizing the occurrence and degree of hypertension. However, the applications for self-management of hypertension are limited and of substandard quality due to inadequate information and research. Although applications satisfy some clinical guidelines, physical therapists should advise their patients not to rely solely on them as they are not the most optimal form of medical care.
高血压自我管理的移动应用程序:系统综述
目的:识别和描述苹果和b谷歌面向高血压自我管理的应用程序,并评估其质量、功能、内容有效性和实用性。方法:这是对菲律宾高血压自我管理移动应用程序的系统综述。入选标准包括在过去五年内创建的应用程序,基于智能手机,并在Android OS或iOS上运行。该研究排除了针对其他医疗条件的应用程序,以及仅供参考和临床医生使用的应用程序。选定的应用程序通过移动应用评定量表(MARS)进行评估,并进行临床指南依从性分析。结果:共过滤了1607个应用程序,剩下266个应用程序。12份申请符合标准,但由于无法访问,只有4份申请被纳入研究。FITZY+获得了最高的MARS平均值(4.06)。功能领域有超过一半(3/ 4,75%)的应用程序的最高分。所有应用(4/4,100%)均参照临床指南坚持治疗高血压。结论和意义:移动健康应用程序是有前途的工具,能够最大限度地减少高血压的发生和程度。然而,由于信息和研究不足,高血压自我管理的应用有限,质量不达标。虽然应用程序满足一些临床指南,物理治疗师应该建议他们的病人不要完全依赖它们,因为它们不是最理想的医疗护理形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信