Parametric study in Element Free Galerkin method for an elastic bar

Sachin D. Daxini, G. Rohit, J. Prajapati
{"title":"Parametric study in Element Free Galerkin method for an elastic bar","authors":"Sachin D. Daxini, G. Rohit, J. Prajapati","doi":"10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7754740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meshfree Methods (MMs) have become popular as an alternative numerical simulation technique to handle problems of diverse engineering fields where conventional grid based methods are not suitable. Element Free Galerkin (EFG) method is a popular meshfree approach based on global weak form of governing differential equation and employs Moving Least Square (MLS) approximants to construct shape functions. While deriving solution with EFG, following selectable parameters affect solution accuracy and computational efforts: Order of monomial basis function and weight function selection in MLS approximants, size of influence domain, uniform and non-uniform node distribution, number of Gauss points in integration cells and the method of imposing essential boundary conditions. In the present paper, aforesaid significant parameters are studied individually to check its influence on solution accuracy in EFG and suggest near optimal selection. An axially loaded elastic bar problem is taken as case study for unambiguous presentation of results. Finally, when EFG results are compared with standard FEM solution, it is found that EFG displacements are more accurate than FEM and EFG stress results are continuous in the domain in contrast to discontinuous stress values in FEM at element boundaries.","PeriodicalId":383674,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7754740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Meshfree Methods (MMs) have become popular as an alternative numerical simulation technique to handle problems of diverse engineering fields where conventional grid based methods are not suitable. Element Free Galerkin (EFG) method is a popular meshfree approach based on global weak form of governing differential equation and employs Moving Least Square (MLS) approximants to construct shape functions. While deriving solution with EFG, following selectable parameters affect solution accuracy and computational efforts: Order of monomial basis function and weight function selection in MLS approximants, size of influence domain, uniform and non-uniform node distribution, number of Gauss points in integration cells and the method of imposing essential boundary conditions. In the present paper, aforesaid significant parameters are studied individually to check its influence on solution accuracy in EFG and suggest near optimal selection. An axially loaded elastic bar problem is taken as case study for unambiguous presentation of results. Finally, when EFG results are compared with standard FEM solution, it is found that EFG displacements are more accurate than FEM and EFG stress results are continuous in the domain in contrast to discontinuous stress values in FEM at element boundaries.
弹性杆的无单元伽辽金法参数化研究
无网格方法(mmms)作为一种可替代的数值模拟技术,在处理传统的基于网格的方法不适合的各种工程领域的问题方面得到了广泛的应用。无单元伽辽金(EFG)方法是一种流行的无网格方法,它基于控制微分方程的全局弱形式,采用移动最小二乘(MLS)近似来构造形状函数。在使用EFG推导解时,以下可选参数影响解的精度和计算工作量:MLS近似中单项式基函数和权函数的选择顺序、影响域的大小、均匀和非均匀节点分布、积分单元中的高斯点数量以及施加必要边界条件的方法。本文分别对上述重要参数进行了研究,以检验其对EFG解精度的影响,并给出了近似最优选择。以一个轴向加载弹性杆问题为例,对结果进行了明确的表述。最后,将EFG结果与标准有限元解进行比较,发现EFG位移比FEM更准确,EFG应力结果在单元边界处是连续的,而FEM应力值是不连续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信