Involving older people in practice development work: An evaluation of an intermediate care service and practice

J. Dewing, J. Brooks, Lisa Riddaway
{"title":"Involving older people in practice development work: An evaluation of an intermediate care service and practice","authors":"J. Dewing, J. Brooks, Lisa Riddaway","doi":"10.1002/PDH.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A shared vision driving a three year systematic practice development strategy within the intermediate care services of one primary care trust in England included an element of facilitating greater user involvement. This particular practice development work demonstrates how service users, in this case older people with intensive rehabilitation needs, were involved in the evaluation work. The evaluation work, comprising four methods (Patient Centreometer Questionnaire, Service Questionnaire, Focus Group and Patient/Carer Stories) was used to facilitate or enable multi-disciplinary practitioners in the practice development group actively to learn through a different form of engagement with older people outside of the usual ‘patient’ and ‘caregiver’ roles. The learning achieved from the process and the evidence obtained through the evaluation methods provided motivation, increased commitment and generated a practice development action plan that enabled changes in practice to be implemented based genuinely on users' experiences. This article also shows how this practice development work moved away from the notion of the baseline and comparative evaluation method to more of an ongoing and integrative method of evaluation. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":322010,"journal":{"name":"Practice Development in Health Care","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice Development in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/PDH.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A shared vision driving a three year systematic practice development strategy within the intermediate care services of one primary care trust in England included an element of facilitating greater user involvement. This particular practice development work demonstrates how service users, in this case older people with intensive rehabilitation needs, were involved in the evaluation work. The evaluation work, comprising four methods (Patient Centreometer Questionnaire, Service Questionnaire, Focus Group and Patient/Carer Stories) was used to facilitate or enable multi-disciplinary practitioners in the practice development group actively to learn through a different form of engagement with older people outside of the usual ‘patient’ and ‘caregiver’ roles. The learning achieved from the process and the evidence obtained through the evaluation methods provided motivation, increased commitment and generated a practice development action plan that enabled changes in practice to be implemented based genuinely on users' experiences. This article also shows how this practice development work moved away from the notion of the baseline and comparative evaluation method to more of an ongoing and integrative method of evaluation. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
让老年人参与实践发展工作:对中间护理服务和实践的评估
在英格兰的一个初级保健信托机构的中间护理服务中,推动三年系统实践发展战略的共同愿景包括促进更多用户参与的要素。这种特殊的实践发展工作说明了服务使用者,在这种情况下是有强烈康复需要的老年人,如何参与评估工作。评估工作包括四种方法(患者中心测量问卷、服务问卷、焦点小组和患者/护理人员故事),用于促进或使实践发展小组中的多学科从业人员在通常的“患者”和“护理人员”角色之外,通过与老年人进行不同形式的接触来积极学习。从过程中获得的学习和通过评估方法获得的证据提供了动力,增加了承诺,并产生了实践发展行动计划,使实践中的变化能够真正基于用户的经验来实施。本文还展示了该实践开发工作如何从基线和比较评估方法的概念转移到更多的持续和综合评估方法。版权所有©2006约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信