Modern prejudice at work: Effects of homonegativity and the perceived erotic value of lesbians and gay men on heterosexuals’ reactions to explicit and discrete couples

Carmen Buechel, P. Hegarty
{"title":"Modern prejudice at work: Effects of homonegativity and the perceived erotic value of lesbians and gay men on heterosexuals’ reactions to explicit and discrete couples","authors":"Carmen Buechel, P. Hegarty","doi":"10.53841/bpslg.2007.8.1.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern heterosexism has been described as a negative attitude that differs from ‘old-fashioned’ moral objections about homosexuality, but includes more abstract objections, such as the view that gay men and lesbian women exaggerate the importance of, or flaunt their sexuality (Morrison & Morrison, 2002). Modern heterosexists are likely to accept homosexuality per se, while feeling uncomfortable with people ‘doing’ homosexuality. Sixty-seven male and 68 female students read vignettes about either a gay, lesbian, or straight couple who were co-workers and who were dating explicitly or discretely. Participants expressed their acceptance of and comfort with the couple, and their reaction to a complaint made about them by a co-worker. Males scored higher than females on old-fashioned and modern prejudice. High scorers, but not low scorers, on a modern heterosexism scale preferred discrete to explicit homosexual couples. Additionally, men who perceived lesbianism as highly erotic were no more acceptant of lesbian than gay couples. Results are discussed and implications for future research are described.","PeriodicalId":311409,"journal":{"name":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpslg.2007.8.1.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Modern heterosexism has been described as a negative attitude that differs from ‘old-fashioned’ moral objections about homosexuality, but includes more abstract objections, such as the view that gay men and lesbian women exaggerate the importance of, or flaunt their sexuality (Morrison & Morrison, 2002). Modern heterosexists are likely to accept homosexuality per se, while feeling uncomfortable with people ‘doing’ homosexuality. Sixty-seven male and 68 female students read vignettes about either a gay, lesbian, or straight couple who were co-workers and who were dating explicitly or discretely. Participants expressed their acceptance of and comfort with the couple, and their reaction to a complaint made about them by a co-worker. Males scored higher than females on old-fashioned and modern prejudice. High scorers, but not low scorers, on a modern heterosexism scale preferred discrete to explicit homosexual couples. Additionally, men who perceived lesbianism as highly erotic were no more acceptant of lesbian than gay couples. Results are discussed and implications for future research are described.
工作中的现代偏见:同性恋的负面影响和男女同性恋的感知性价值对异性恋者对明确和离散伴侣的反应的影响
现代异性恋被描述为一种消极的态度,不同于“老式的”对同性恋的道德反对,但包括更抽象的反对,比如认为男同性恋和女同性恋夸大了性的重要性,或炫耀他们的性取向(Morrison & Morrison, 2002)。现代异性恋者很可能接受同性恋本身,同时对人们“做”同性恋感到不舒服。67名男学生和68名女学生读了一篇小短文,内容是一对男同性恋、女同性恋或异性恋的同事,他们公开或私下约会。参与者表达了他们对这对夫妇的接受和安慰,以及他们对同事对他们的抱怨的反应。在老式和现代偏见方面,男性得分高于女性。在现代异性恋量表上,得分高的人,而不是得分低的人,更喜欢不公开的同性恋伴侣。此外,那些认为女同性恋非常性感的男性并不比男同性恋更能接受女同性恋。对结果进行了讨论,并对未来研究的意义进行了描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信