Policy incentives for private innovation and maximising the returns

Ben Westmore
{"title":"Policy incentives for private innovation and maximising the returns","authors":"Ben Westmore","doi":"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2013-5K3TRMJLHXZQ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses panel regression techniques to assess the policy determinants of private-sector innovative activity – proxied by R&D expenditure and the number of new patents – across 19 OECD countries. The relationship between innovation indicators and multifactor productivity (MFP) growth is also examined with a particular focus on the role of public policies in influencing the returns to new knowledge. The results establish an empirical link between R&D and patenting, as well as between these measures of innovation intensity and MFP growth. Innovation-specific policies such as R&D tax incentives, direct government support and patent rights are found to be successful in encouraging the innovative activities associated with higher productivity growth. However, direct empirical evidence of the positive effects of these policies on productivity is less forthcoming. A pervasive theme from the analysis is the importance of coupling policies aimed at encouraging innovation or technological adoption with well-designed framework policies that allow knowledge spillovers to proliferate. In particular, the settings of framework policies relating to product market regulation, openness to trade and debtor protection in bankruptcy provisions are found to be important for the diffusion of new technologies. JEL classification: L20, O30, O40 Keywords: Intangible assets, innovation, productivity growth, public policy","PeriodicalId":416490,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2013-5K3TRMJLHXZQ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

This paper uses panel regression techniques to assess the policy determinants of private-sector innovative activity – proxied by R&D expenditure and the number of new patents – across 19 OECD countries. The relationship between innovation indicators and multifactor productivity (MFP) growth is also examined with a particular focus on the role of public policies in influencing the returns to new knowledge. The results establish an empirical link between R&D and patenting, as well as between these measures of innovation intensity and MFP growth. Innovation-specific policies such as R&D tax incentives, direct government support and patent rights are found to be successful in encouraging the innovative activities associated with higher productivity growth. However, direct empirical evidence of the positive effects of these policies on productivity is less forthcoming. A pervasive theme from the analysis is the importance of coupling policies aimed at encouraging innovation or technological adoption with well-designed framework policies that allow knowledge spillovers to proliferate. In particular, the settings of framework policies relating to product market regulation, openness to trade and debtor protection in bankruptcy provisions are found to be important for the diffusion of new technologies. JEL classification: L20, O30, O40 Keywords: Intangible assets, innovation, productivity growth, public policy
私人创新的政策激励和回报最大化
本文利用面板回归技术评估了19个经合组织国家私营部门创新活动的政策决定因素——以研发支出和新专利数量为代表。还研究了创新指标与多要素生产率增长之间的关系,特别侧重于公共政策在影响新知识回报方面的作用。研究结果建立了研发与专利之间的实证联系,以及这些创新强度指标与MFP增长之间的实证联系。研究发现,研发税收激励、政府直接支持和专利权等特定创新政策在鼓励与更高生产率增长相关的创新活动方面取得了成功。然而,这些政策对生产率产生积极影响的直接经验证据并不多见。该分析的一个普遍主题是,将旨在鼓励创新或技术采用的政策与设计良好、允许知识溢出扩散的框架政策结合起来的重要性。特别是,与产品市场管制、贸易开放和破产条款中的债务人保护有关的框架政策的设定对于新技术的传播是重要的。关键词:无形资产,创新,生产率增长,公共政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信