Civil Engineering Student Perception Towards Blended Learning in A Malaysian Public University

W. Lee, C. M. M. Isa, W. Tahir
{"title":"Civil Engineering Student Perception Towards Blended Learning in A Malaysian Public University","authors":"W. Lee, C. M. M. Isa, W. Tahir","doi":"10.1109/ICEED47294.2019.8994945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blended learning (BL) has been evolving as an important approach to teaching and learning in tertiary education. Much research has been conducted on BL implementation in various courses but study on its suitability for engineering education is still lacking. This paper presents student perceptions on the current implementation of BL in engineering undergraduate and postgraduate courses in a Malaysian public university. Three hundred and sixty-five (365) usable responses were received through an online questionnaire survey conducted at the end of a 14-week semester. Results show that students are more likely to access the e-materials but are less engaged in forum activities. Some students ignore online assessments which do not carry weightage towards course assessments. Overall, students agree that BL is beneficial but less amongst them find it enjoyable. Undergraduate and postgraduate students have slightly varied acceptance towards BL. The four (4) academic divisions in the faculty fair differently but most courses have been recommended by respondents for an internal faculty award. This study provides empirical data pointing towards room of improvement for BL in engineering education. Future work should examine the effectiveness of BL approach based on true attainment of student learning outcomes and graduate attributes.","PeriodicalId":250947,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED47294.2019.8994945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Blended learning (BL) has been evolving as an important approach to teaching and learning in tertiary education. Much research has been conducted on BL implementation in various courses but study on its suitability for engineering education is still lacking. This paper presents student perceptions on the current implementation of BL in engineering undergraduate and postgraduate courses in a Malaysian public university. Three hundred and sixty-five (365) usable responses were received through an online questionnaire survey conducted at the end of a 14-week semester. Results show that students are more likely to access the e-materials but are less engaged in forum activities. Some students ignore online assessments which do not carry weightage towards course assessments. Overall, students agree that BL is beneficial but less amongst them find it enjoyable. Undergraduate and postgraduate students have slightly varied acceptance towards BL. The four (4) academic divisions in the faculty fair differently but most courses have been recommended by respondents for an internal faculty award. This study provides empirical data pointing towards room of improvement for BL in engineering education. Future work should examine the effectiveness of BL approach based on true attainment of student learning outcomes and graduate attributes.
马来西亚公立大学土木工程专业学生对混合式学习的看法
混合学习(BL)作为高等教育中一种重要的教与学方法正在不断发展。关于在各种课程中实施BL的研究很多,但对其在工程教育中的适用性的研究还很缺乏。本文介绍了学生对目前在马来西亚公立大学工程本科和研究生课程中实施BL的看法。在为期14周的学期结束时,通过在线问卷调查收到了365份可用的回复。结果表明,学生更有可能访问电子材料,但较少参与论坛活动。有些学生忽略了在线评估,因为在线评估对课程评估没有权重。总的来说,学生们认为英语是有益的,但很少有人觉得它很有趣。本科生和研究生对BL的接受程度略有不同。学院的四(4)个学术部门的公平程度不同,但大多数课程都是由受访者推荐的内部教员奖。本研究提供了经验数据,指出工程教学中BL的改进空间。未来的工作应该基于学生学习成果和毕业生属性的真实实现来检验BL方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信