Investigating Students' Self-Assessment of Conceptual Understanding Using Self-Assessment Cards in Chemistry

M. Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, V. Jurková, B. Brestenská, Katarína Szarka, M. Kožurková
{"title":"Investigating Students' Self-Assessment of Conceptual Understanding Using Self-Assessment Cards in Chemistry","authors":"M. Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, V. Jurková, B. Brestenská, Katarína Szarka, M. Kožurková","doi":"10.1145/3401861.3401864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, the OECD team warned that regular assessment of students in Slovakia is not formative enough and proposed introducing \"formative assessment elements\" into the Slovak system of education. An inherent part of formative assessment is students' self-assessment, and one of its techniques is the self-assessment card. The goal of this research was to determine the correlation between students' self-assessment using the self-assessment card and their level of conceptual understanding. The method used to achieve this goal was a single-group quasi-experiment performed at a selected Slovak grammar school in Rožňava. The analysis results show that the dependency between students' results and their self-assessment is significant, direct, and high. Further results showed no statistically significant difference between students' self-assessment and the difficulty of the tasks (from remembering to analysis). It means that the students were capable of objective self-assessment at all levels of conceptual task difficulty from remembering to analysis -- they neither overestimate, nor underestimate themselves.","PeriodicalId":403147,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Modern Educational Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Modern Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3401861.3401864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2014, the OECD team warned that regular assessment of students in Slovakia is not formative enough and proposed introducing "formative assessment elements" into the Slovak system of education. An inherent part of formative assessment is students' self-assessment, and one of its techniques is the self-assessment card. The goal of this research was to determine the correlation between students' self-assessment using the self-assessment card and their level of conceptual understanding. The method used to achieve this goal was a single-group quasi-experiment performed at a selected Slovak grammar school in Rožňava. The analysis results show that the dependency between students' results and their self-assessment is significant, direct, and high. Further results showed no statistically significant difference between students' self-assessment and the difficulty of the tasks (from remembering to analysis). It means that the students were capable of objective self-assessment at all levels of conceptual task difficulty from remembering to analysis -- they neither overestimate, nor underestimate themselves.
利用化学自评卡调查学生对概念理解能力的自我评价
2014年,经合组织小组警告说,对斯洛伐克学生的定期评估不够形成性,并建议在斯洛伐克的教育体系中引入“形成性评估要素”。形成性评价的一个固有部分是学生的自我评价,自我评价卡是形成性评价的手段之一。本研究的目的是确定学生使用自评卡的自评与他们的概念理解水平之间的相关性。实现这一目标的方法是在Rožňava选定的一所斯洛伐克文法学校进行单组准实验。分析结果表明,学生成绩与自我评价的相关性显著、直接、高。进一步的结果显示,学生的自我评估和任务的难度(从记忆到分析)之间没有统计学上的显著差异。这意味着学生能够客观地评估从记忆到分析的各种概念任务难度——他们既不高估自己,也不低估自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信