«Misery is a Vice» and «Who is Happy in Russia?»: Injustice and Compassion in Nekrasov and Dostoevsky

S. M. Capilupi
{"title":"«Misery is a Vice» and «Who is Happy in Russia?»: Injustice and Compassion in Nekrasov and Dostoevsky","authors":"S. M. Capilupi","doi":"10.17759/langt.2021080401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historical and hermeneutic dialogue between Nekrasov and Dostoevsky acquires special significance as an opportunity for a new dialogue between believers and non-believers, which is necessary for general social and cultural development. Nekrasov was actually a believing Christian, but he received a lot of resonance in Soviet education as a bearer of secular ideals. His new consideration today, after the religious renaissance of Russian culture, is an interesting and promising task. At the same time, Dostoevsky's question of «eschatological antinomianism» turns out to be decisive also in this context: the need to sanctify suffering and the necessary hope for its overcoming are two sides of the same ontological and epistemological paradox, which is always valid for all Christians as well as for all thinkers, preoccupied by common human destinies.","PeriodicalId":414200,"journal":{"name":"Язык и текст","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Язык и текст","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2021080401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The historical and hermeneutic dialogue between Nekrasov and Dostoevsky acquires special significance as an opportunity for a new dialogue between believers and non-believers, which is necessary for general social and cultural development. Nekrasov was actually a believing Christian, but he received a lot of resonance in Soviet education as a bearer of secular ideals. His new consideration today, after the religious renaissance of Russian culture, is an interesting and promising task. At the same time, Dostoevsky's question of «eschatological antinomianism» turns out to be decisive also in this context: the need to sanctify suffering and the necessary hope for its overcoming are two sides of the same ontological and epistemological paradox, which is always valid for all Christians as well as for all thinkers, preoccupied by common human destinies.
《痛苦是一种罪恶》和《谁在俄罗斯快乐?》:涅克拉索夫和陀思妥耶夫斯基的不公正与同情
涅克拉索夫与陀思妥耶夫斯基之间的历史和解释学对话具有特殊的意义,因为它为信教者与非信教者之间的新对话提供了机会,而这种对话对于一般的社会和文化发展是必要的。涅克拉索夫实际上是一名虔诚的基督徒,但他作为世俗理想的承载者在苏联教育中得到了很多共鸣。今天,在俄罗斯文化的宗教复兴之后,他的新思考是一项有趣而有前途的任务。与此同时,陀思妥耶夫斯基的“末世论反法主义”问题在这种背景下也被证明是决定性的:圣化痛苦的需要和克服痛苦的必要希望是同一本体论和认识论悖论的两个方面,这对所有基督徒和所有思想家都是有效的,他们都专注于共同的人类命运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信