Maternal dietary diversity and dietary quality scores in relation to adverse birth outcomes in Tanzanian women.

I. Madzorera, Sheila Isanaka, Molin Wang, G. Msamanga, W. Urassa, E. Hertzmark, C. Duggan, W. Fawzi
{"title":"Maternal dietary diversity and dietary quality scores in relation to adverse birth outcomes in Tanzanian women.","authors":"I. Madzorera, Sheila Isanaka, Molin Wang, G. Msamanga, W. Urassa, E. Hertzmark, C. Duggan, W. Fawzi","doi":"10.1093/cdn/nzaa054_103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPreterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), and low birth weight (LBW) are risk factors for morbidity and mortality among infants. High-quality maternal diets during pregnancy may protect against these adverse birth outcomes.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThe aim of this study was to prospectively examine the association of maternal dietary diversity and quality during pregnancy with birth outcomes among women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe analyzed data from 7553 HIV-negative pregnant women enrolled in a multivitamin trial at 12-27 weeks of gestation. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-h dietary recalls. Dietary diversity scores (DDS; range: 0-10) were computed as the number of food groups consumed by women, using FAO's Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women index. The Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS; range: 0-42) assessed maternal diet quality based on consumption of 21 healthy and unhealthy food groups. Log binomial regression methods were used to assess associations of DDS and PDQS with PTB, SGA, LBW, and fetal loss.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn the previous 24 h, 99.9% of all women had consumed cereal and staples, 57.9% meats, 4.7% eggs, and 0.5% nuts and seeds. Median DDS was 3.0 (IQR: 2.5-3.5). For the PDQS, all women consumed ≥4 servings/wk of green leafy vegetables and refined grains. Higher DDS was associated with lower risk of SGA (RR highest compared with lowest quintile: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.89). Higher PDQS was associated with lower risk of PTB (RR highest compared with lowest quintile: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.66), LBW (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.70), and fetal loss (RR: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34, 0.82).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPDQS was inversely associated with PTB, LBW, and fetal loss, and DDS was inversely associated with SGA. These findings suggest that in addition to dietary diversity, diet quality should be considered as important in understanding dietary risk factors for poor birth outcomes.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00197548.","PeriodicalId":315016,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa054_103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

BACKGROUND Preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), and low birth weight (LBW) are risk factors for morbidity and mortality among infants. High-quality maternal diets during pregnancy may protect against these adverse birth outcomes. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to prospectively examine the association of maternal dietary diversity and quality during pregnancy with birth outcomes among women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. METHODS We analyzed data from 7553 HIV-negative pregnant women enrolled in a multivitamin trial at 12-27 weeks of gestation. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-h dietary recalls. Dietary diversity scores (DDS; range: 0-10) were computed as the number of food groups consumed by women, using FAO's Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women index. The Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS; range: 0-42) assessed maternal diet quality based on consumption of 21 healthy and unhealthy food groups. Log binomial regression methods were used to assess associations of DDS and PDQS with PTB, SGA, LBW, and fetal loss. RESULTS In the previous 24 h, 99.9% of all women had consumed cereal and staples, 57.9% meats, 4.7% eggs, and 0.5% nuts and seeds. Median DDS was 3.0 (IQR: 2.5-3.5). For the PDQS, all women consumed ≥4 servings/wk of green leafy vegetables and refined grains. Higher DDS was associated with lower risk of SGA (RR highest compared with lowest quintile: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.89). Higher PDQS was associated with lower risk of PTB (RR highest compared with lowest quintile: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.66), LBW (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.70), and fetal loss (RR: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34, 0.82). CONCLUSIONS PDQS was inversely associated with PTB, LBW, and fetal loss, and DDS was inversely associated with SGA. These findings suggest that in addition to dietary diversity, diet quality should be considered as important in understanding dietary risk factors for poor birth outcomes.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00197548.
产妇饮食多样性和饮食质量得分与坦桑尼亚妇女不良分娩结果的关系。
背景:早产(PTB)、小胎龄(SGA)和低出生体重(LBW)是婴儿发病率和死亡率的危险因素。孕期高质量的产妇饮食可以预防这些不良的分娩结果。目的:本研究的目的是前瞻性地研究坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆妇女孕期产妇饮食多样性和质量与分娩结果的关系。方法:我们分析了7553名hiv阴性孕妇的数据,这些孕妇在妊娠12-27周时参加了一项多种维生素试验。采用24小时饮食回顾法评估膳食摄入量。膳食多样性评分(DDS);范围:0-10),根据粮农组织妇女最低膳食多样性指数计算妇女消费的食物种类。主要饮食质量评分(PDQS);范围:0-42)根据21种健康和不健康食品的消费评估了产妇的饮食质量。采用对数二项回归方法评估DDS和PDQS与PTB、SGA、LBW和胎儿丢失的关系。结果在过去的24小时内,99.9%的女性食用谷物和主食,57.9%食用肉类,4.7%食用鸡蛋,0.5%食用坚果和种子。中位DDS为3.0 (IQR: 2.5-3.5)。对于PDQS,所有女性每周食用≥4份绿叶蔬菜和精制谷物。较高的DDS与较低的SGA风险相关(RR最高与最低五分位数:0.74;95% ci: 0.62, 0.89)。较高的PDQS与较低的PTB风险相关(RR最高与最低五分位数:0.55;95% ci: 0.46, 0.66), LBW (rr: 0.53;95% CI: 0.40, 0.70)和胎儿丢失(RR: 0.53;95% ci, 0.34, 0.82)。结论spdqs与PTB、LBW、胎儿丢失呈负相关,DDS与SGA呈负相关。这些发现表明,除了饮食多样性外,饮食质量在理解不良出生结局的饮食风险因素方面也应被视为重要因素。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov注册为NCT00197548。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信