Comparison of Effects of NDT Vs BWSTT On Lower Extremity Among Chronic Stroke Patients

{"title":"Comparison of Effects of NDT Vs BWSTT On Lower Extremity Among Chronic Stroke Patients","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jnh.08.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of Neurodevelopment Treatment Vs Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training along with conventional therapy on lower extremity among chronic stroke patients. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Place and Duration of study: This study took place n Lahore, Pakistan and the duration of the study was 6 months. Method: This study is a Randomized Controlled Trial utilized a non-probability purposive sampling technique, the primary outcome measure was Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment which were used to check the balance and gait. The findings were then statistically analysed by non parametric tests Mann Whitney U Test and Friedman Test were used for between group and within the group comparisons respectively. Results: A total of 46 patients participated in the study among which after randomized allocation of 23(50%) in NDT and 23(50%) in BWSTT group. NDT group showed better results than the BWSTT group and the p value is 0.000 which is less than 0.05 when compared between the groups for balance at 12 weeks. NDT group showed better results than the BWSTT group and the p value is 0.001 which is less than 0.05 when compared between the groups for mobility at 12 weeks. Therefore, NDT is better than BWSTT for the improvement of both balance and mobility. Conclusion: Both of the treatment approaches have proven to be effective in treatment of balance and gait among chronic stroke patients but Neurodevelopmental Treatment has proven to be significantly more effective than Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training and has more significant results. Discussion: In the current study where NDT and BWSTT are compared to each other shows that NDT is highly effective for the treatment of balance in post stroke patients as compared to BWSTT that is only effective within the group but not as effective as NDT. Similarly Grozdek Covcic et.al in 2021 did a research on “Effects of Bobath treatment and specific mobilizations on gait in stroke patients” which indicated that Bobath technique in combination with soft tissue mobilization shows better results for the maintenance of balance and mobility in post-stroke patients. Also the Bobath treatment helped with increased AROM of the patient [1].","PeriodicalId":302843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh.08.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of Neurodevelopment Treatment Vs Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training along with conventional therapy on lower extremity among chronic stroke patients. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Place and Duration of study: This study took place n Lahore, Pakistan and the duration of the study was 6 months. Method: This study is a Randomized Controlled Trial utilized a non-probability purposive sampling technique, the primary outcome measure was Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment which were used to check the balance and gait. The findings were then statistically analysed by non parametric tests Mann Whitney U Test and Friedman Test were used for between group and within the group comparisons respectively. Results: A total of 46 patients participated in the study among which after randomized allocation of 23(50%) in NDT and 23(50%) in BWSTT group. NDT group showed better results than the BWSTT group and the p value is 0.000 which is less than 0.05 when compared between the groups for balance at 12 weeks. NDT group showed better results than the BWSTT group and the p value is 0.001 which is less than 0.05 when compared between the groups for mobility at 12 weeks. Therefore, NDT is better than BWSTT for the improvement of both balance and mobility. Conclusion: Both of the treatment approaches have proven to be effective in treatment of balance and gait among chronic stroke patients but Neurodevelopmental Treatment has proven to be significantly more effective than Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training and has more significant results. Discussion: In the current study where NDT and BWSTT are compared to each other shows that NDT is highly effective for the treatment of balance in post stroke patients as compared to BWSTT that is only effective within the group but not as effective as NDT. Similarly Grozdek Covcic et.al in 2021 did a research on “Effects of Bobath treatment and specific mobilizations on gait in stroke patients” which indicated that Bobath technique in combination with soft tissue mobilization shows better results for the maintenance of balance and mobility in post-stroke patients. Also the Bobath treatment helped with increased AROM of the patient [1].
NDT与BWSTT对慢性脑卒中患者下肢的影响比较
目的:本研究的目的是确定神经发育治疗与体重支撑跑步机训练结合常规治疗对慢性脑卒中患者下肢的影响。研究设计:随机对照试验(RCT)。研究地点和时间:本研究在巴基斯坦拉合尔进行,研究时间为6个月。方法:本研究采用非概率目的抽样技术,采用随机对照试验,主要结局指标为Berg平衡量表和功能步态评估。然后通过非参数检验对结果进行统计分析,Mann Whitney U检验和Friedman检验分别用于组间和组内比较。结果:共有46例患者参与研究,其中随机分配NDT组23例(50%),BWSTT组23例(50%)。NDT组优于BWSTT组,12周平衡组间比较p值为0.000,p值小于0.05。NDT组优于BWSTT组,12周活动度p值为0.001,组间比较p值小于0.05。因此,NDT比BWSTT更能提高平衡性和移动性。结论:两种治疗方法均可有效治疗慢性卒中患者的平衡和步态,但神经发育治疗已被证明比体重支持的跑步机训练更有效,效果更显著。讨论:在目前的研究中,NDT和BWSTT相互比较表明,NDT对于脑卒中后患者平衡的治疗非常有效,而BWSTT仅在组内有效,不如NDT有效。同样,Grozdek Covcic等人在2021年做了一项“Bobath治疗和特定活动对卒中患者步态的影响”的研究,表明Bobath技术结合软组织活动对卒中后患者的平衡和活动维持效果更好。此外,Bobath治疗有助于增加患者的AROM[1]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信