Joint Venture Interests as Securities

Herrick K. Lidstone
{"title":"Joint Venture Interests as Securities","authors":"Herrick K. Lidstone","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2546839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorado federal and state courts have considered whether joint venture interests offered to participants for oil and gas development are securities subject to regulation under federal and state securities laws seven times since 2011. In the most recent State trial court decision on remand from the Colorado Court of Appeals, the joint venture interests were found to be securities, and the defendants were found to be offering and selling the securities. This decision is now consistent with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and likely spells the end of the oil and gas joint venture programs structured to avoid securities regulation while still cold-calling a large number of prospective investors, providing nominal management rights, and not requiring industry expertise. In Colorado, the Court of Appeals decision firmly established the \"economic realities\" test as the test to determine whether a transaction involved a security, and eliminated the \"strong presumption\" established in Williamson v. Tucker that a general partnership interest was not a security. consistently with the Tenth Circuit, provided a path for those wishing to form or defend joint ventures to follow. While, as noted by the Court of Appeals, “[courts] look at the expectations...at the time the interest is sold”, meaningful post-sale participation can be an indication of what the parties (and especially the investors) expected at the time of sale.","PeriodicalId":191299,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporations (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporations (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2546839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorado federal and state courts have considered whether joint venture interests offered to participants for oil and gas development are securities subject to regulation under federal and state securities laws seven times since 2011. In the most recent State trial court decision on remand from the Colorado Court of Appeals, the joint venture interests were found to be securities, and the defendants were found to be offering and selling the securities. This decision is now consistent with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and likely spells the end of the oil and gas joint venture programs structured to avoid securities regulation while still cold-calling a large number of prospective investors, providing nominal management rights, and not requiring industry expertise. In Colorado, the Court of Appeals decision firmly established the "economic realities" test as the test to determine whether a transaction involved a security, and eliminated the "strong presumption" established in Williamson v. Tucker that a general partnership interest was not a security. consistently with the Tenth Circuit, provided a path for those wishing to form or defend joint ventures to follow. While, as noted by the Court of Appeals, “[courts] look at the expectations...at the time the interest is sold”, meaningful post-sale participation can be an indication of what the parties (and especially the investors) expected at the time of sale.
作为证券的合营权益
自2011年以来,科罗拉多州联邦和州法院已经七次考虑向油气开发参与者提供的合资企业权益是否属于证券,应受到联邦和州证券法的监管。在科罗拉多州上诉法院最近发回的州初审法院判决中,合营企业的利益被认定为有价证券,被告被认定提供和出售有价证券。这一决定现在与第十巡回上诉法院的判决一致,可能意味着油气合资项目的终结,这些项目旨在避开证券监管,同时仍然给大量潜在投资者打电话,提供名义上的管理权,并且不需要行业专业知识。在科罗拉多州,上诉法院的判决坚定地确立了“经济现实”测试作为确定交易是否涉及证券的测试,并消除了威廉姆森诉塔克案中确立的“强推定”,即普通合伙权益不是证券。与第十巡回法院一致,为那些希望组建或捍卫合资企业的人提供了一条道路。然而,正如上诉法院所指出的那样,“[法院]考虑的是期望……“在出售权益时”,有意义的售后参与可以表明各方(尤其是投资者)在出售时的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信