Short Answer Scoring in English Grammar Using Text Similarity Measurement

Akeem Olowolayemo, Santhy David Nawi, T. Mantoro
{"title":"Short Answer Scoring in English Grammar Using Text Similarity Measurement","authors":"Akeem Olowolayemo, Santhy David Nawi, T. Mantoro","doi":"10.1109/ICCED.2018.00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment in educational institution is an important system to evaluate academic performance among students. The assessment is done by teacher either manually or using automated scoring technology. This study employed natural language processing approach to automated short answer scoring system using textual similarity. There are various types of questions in an examination paper. These include multiple choices question, short answer based question, fill-in-the-blanks questions and essay questions. In this study, the focus is on fill-in-the-blanks questions type. Students are required to answer each question with 2-5 words. The scope of the subject is narrowed to English grammar for secondary school as a datasets for this study. The datasets included 240 responses for 10 questions selected randomly. Students’ answers are mapped with model answers to measure the textual similarities. The mappings were done using Levenshtein distance (LD) and Cosine similarity measures. Both textual similarity techniques assigned marks to each response according to the similarity distance of student answer and model answer. Certain range of distance values is restricted for both textual similarity techniques. The effectiveness of textual similarity in scoring short based answer is compared with human grader scoring. Both textual similarity techniques show high agreement with human grader for assigning full marks where the maximum percentage is 92 and 94 percent for LD and Cosine similarity respectively. This work should be useful to assist teacher to ease the onerous task of grading.","PeriodicalId":166437,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED)","volume":"90 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED.2018.00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Assessment in educational institution is an important system to evaluate academic performance among students. The assessment is done by teacher either manually or using automated scoring technology. This study employed natural language processing approach to automated short answer scoring system using textual similarity. There are various types of questions in an examination paper. These include multiple choices question, short answer based question, fill-in-the-blanks questions and essay questions. In this study, the focus is on fill-in-the-blanks questions type. Students are required to answer each question with 2-5 words. The scope of the subject is narrowed to English grammar for secondary school as a datasets for this study. The datasets included 240 responses for 10 questions selected randomly. Students’ answers are mapped with model answers to measure the textual similarities. The mappings were done using Levenshtein distance (LD) and Cosine similarity measures. Both textual similarity techniques assigned marks to each response according to the similarity distance of student answer and model answer. Certain range of distance values is restricted for both textual similarity techniques. The effectiveness of textual similarity in scoring short based answer is compared with human grader scoring. Both textual similarity techniques show high agreement with human grader for assigning full marks where the maximum percentage is 92 and 94 percent for LD and Cosine similarity respectively. This work should be useful to assist teacher to ease the onerous task of grading.
基于文本相似度测量的英语语法简答题评分
教育机构评价是评价学生学业成绩的一项重要制度。评估由教师手动或使用自动评分技术完成。本研究将自然语言处理方法应用于基于文本相似度的自动简答评分系统。试卷上有各种各样的题目。这些问题包括选择题、简答题、填空题和作文题。在这项研究中,重点是填空问题类型。要求学生用2-5个单词回答每个问题。该主题的范围被缩小到中学英语语法作为本研究的数据集。数据集包括随机选择的10个问题的240个回答。将学生的答案与模型答案进行映射,以测量文本相似度。映射是使用Levenshtein距离(LD)和余弦相似性度量完成的。两种文本相似度技术都是根据学生答案与模型答案的相似距离给每个答案打分。两种文本相似技术的距离值范围都有一定的限制。本文比较了文本相似度在短答案评分中的有效性。两种文本相似度技术都显示出与人类评分者在分配满分时的高度一致,其中LD和余弦相似度的最大百分比分别为92%和94%。这项工作应该有助于帮助教师减轻繁重的评分工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信