Failure of Nylon Hinges

{"title":"Failure of Nylon Hinges","authors":"","doi":"10.31399/asm.fach.auto.c0090466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A production lot of mechanical hinges used in an automotive application had failed during incoming quality-control routine actuation testing. A change in part supplier had taken place between the approval of the prototype parts that performed acceptably and the receipt of the first lot of production parts. The mechanical hinges were specified to be injection molded from an impact-modified, 13% glass-fiber-reinforced nylon 6/6 resin. Investigation of samples representing the failed components and the original prototype parts included visual inspection, 118x SEM images, micro-FTIR, DSC analysis, and TGA. It supported the conclusion that the hinge assemblies failed through brittle fracture associated with stress overload during the actuation of the parts. The failed part material was found to be degraded, most likely occurring during the compounding of the resin or during the actual molding of the parts. While resins for both failed and non-failed parts produced results characteristic of a 13% glass-fiber-reinforced, impact-modified nylon 6/6, the failed part material, contained a significantly lower level of rubber, which rendered the parts less impact resistant and subsequently lowered the ductility of the molded hinge assemblies. No recommendations were made.","PeriodicalId":235345,"journal":{"name":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Automobiles and Trucks","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Automobiles and Trucks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.auto.c0090466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A production lot of mechanical hinges used in an automotive application had failed during incoming quality-control routine actuation testing. A change in part supplier had taken place between the approval of the prototype parts that performed acceptably and the receipt of the first lot of production parts. The mechanical hinges were specified to be injection molded from an impact-modified, 13% glass-fiber-reinforced nylon 6/6 resin. Investigation of samples representing the failed components and the original prototype parts included visual inspection, 118x SEM images, micro-FTIR, DSC analysis, and TGA. It supported the conclusion that the hinge assemblies failed through brittle fracture associated with stress overload during the actuation of the parts. The failed part material was found to be degraded, most likely occurring during the compounding of the resin or during the actual molding of the parts. While resins for both failed and non-failed parts produced results characteristic of a 13% glass-fiber-reinforced, impact-modified nylon 6/6, the failed part material, contained a significantly lower level of rubber, which rendered the parts less impact resistant and subsequently lowered the ductility of the molded hinge assemblies. No recommendations were made.
尼龙铰链失效
某汽车用机械铰链在进厂质量控制常规驱动试验中失败。在验收合格的原型零件和收到第一批生产零件之间,零件供应商发生了变化。机械铰链由抗冲击改性的13%玻璃纤维增强尼龙6/6树脂注塑成型。对代表失效部件和原始原型部件的样品的调查包括目视检查、118x扫描电镜图像、微红外光谱、DSC分析和热重分析。它支持了铰链组件在驱动过程中由于与应力过载相关的脆性断裂而失效的结论。失效的零件材料被发现是降解的,最有可能发生在复合树脂或零件的实际成型过程中。虽然用于失败和非失败部件的树脂产生的结果具有13%的玻璃纤维增强,抗冲击改性尼龙6/6的特征,但失败部件材料中含有的橡胶含量明显较低,这使得部件的抗冲击性降低,随后降低了成型铰链组件的延展性。没有提出任何建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信