{"title":"Bearing capacity and stiffness of pile group foundation","authors":"A. Norkus, V. Martinkus","doi":"10.3846/mbmst.2019.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pile group foundations are widely employed in geotechnical design. Bearing capacity increment/reduction of\npile group (PG) foundation in design practice often described via empirical efficiency factor (EF), a multiplier to sum\nof single piles (SP) resistances, when they act isolated. The magnitude of EF depends on spacing of SP in PG, soil\nparameters, configuration of piles, friction of soil-pile, etc. Proposed predictions for choosing the EF magnitude are\ncontradictory. The tests of displacement SP and PG tests conducted in laboratory conditions for 2 spacing cases, ground\nstress-strain evolution of PG analyzed. The EF magnitude reproduced from tests results compared with proposed by\ndifferent authors predictions. The pronounced effect of installation sequence to displacement SP response measures,\nwhen acting in PG estimated during the tests. From practical point, this phenomenon if ignored for certain connection\ncase of superstructure with PG cap and that of SP with PG cap may cause unexpected PG foundation movements,\nsubsequently resulting the additional stressing of superstructure and foundation. SP installation effect for displacement\nPG foundation measures of ground response should be properly evaluated in design of constructional elements of superstructure and foundation.","PeriodicalId":169478,"journal":{"name":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mbmst.2019.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pile group foundations are widely employed in geotechnical design. Bearing capacity increment/reduction of
pile group (PG) foundation in design practice often described via empirical efficiency factor (EF), a multiplier to sum
of single piles (SP) resistances, when they act isolated. The magnitude of EF depends on spacing of SP in PG, soil
parameters, configuration of piles, friction of soil-pile, etc. Proposed predictions for choosing the EF magnitude are
contradictory. The tests of displacement SP and PG tests conducted in laboratory conditions for 2 spacing cases, ground
stress-strain evolution of PG analyzed. The EF magnitude reproduced from tests results compared with proposed by
different authors predictions. The pronounced effect of installation sequence to displacement SP response measures,
when acting in PG estimated during the tests. From practical point, this phenomenon if ignored for certain connection
case of superstructure with PG cap and that of SP with PG cap may cause unexpected PG foundation movements,
subsequently resulting the additional stressing of superstructure and foundation. SP installation effect for displacement
PG foundation measures of ground response should be properly evaluated in design of constructional elements of superstructure and foundation.