IMPROVING SAFETY BY INTEGRATING DYSFUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS INTO THE DESIGN OF RAILWAY SYSTEMS

Sana Debbech, P. Bon, S. Collart-Dutilleul
{"title":"IMPROVING SAFETY BY INTEGRATING DYSFUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS INTO THE DESIGN OF RAILWAY SYSTEMS","authors":"Sana Debbech, P. Bon, S. Collart-Dutilleul","doi":"10.2495/CR180361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to cope with the increasing design complexity of safety-critical systems, safety assurance should be considered as early as possible in the design process. Using Model-Based System Engineering (MBSE) approaches however lead to new challenges regarding the cohesive integration of both safety engineering and system design along the system development process. Moreover, it helps to anticipate safety problems and detect errors as soon as possible. This is the case of railway systems, which are complex socio-technical systems. From this point of view, the purpose of the present study is to formalize a safety reasoning based on the definition of critical scenarios. The objective is to propose a proactive approach that takes these requirements into account early in the system architecture design. By identifying the impact on the design of the architecture, we will ensure safety by integrating technical devices and human interventions. Based on the related literature, the Preliminary Risk Analysis (PRA) is attested to define safety conditions. These safety requirements are expressed with a high level of abstraction according to the level of knowledge engineering. Qualitative risk analysis methods, such asion according to the level of knowledge engineering. Qualitative risk analysis methods, such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) will be used to analyze the propagation of failures. The second challenge is to trace the high level requirements during the design steps. In order to help the designer to consider safety aspect in the system architecture synthesis, we integrate safety concerns from early design stages, within the MBSE approach. In this paper, we propose a methodology to effectively identify safety conditions, thus to anticipate risks. We also focus our work on the European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS). Finally, we applied specific transformation rules on our ERTMS ontology in order to build a Unified Modeling Language (UML) model.","PeriodicalId":210834,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Railways XVI : Railway Engineering Design and Operation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Railways XVI : Railway Engineering Design and Operation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/CR180361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In order to cope with the increasing design complexity of safety-critical systems, safety assurance should be considered as early as possible in the design process. Using Model-Based System Engineering (MBSE) approaches however lead to new challenges regarding the cohesive integration of both safety engineering and system design along the system development process. Moreover, it helps to anticipate safety problems and detect errors as soon as possible. This is the case of railway systems, which are complex socio-technical systems. From this point of view, the purpose of the present study is to formalize a safety reasoning based on the definition of critical scenarios. The objective is to propose a proactive approach that takes these requirements into account early in the system architecture design. By identifying the impact on the design of the architecture, we will ensure safety by integrating technical devices and human interventions. Based on the related literature, the Preliminary Risk Analysis (PRA) is attested to define safety conditions. These safety requirements are expressed with a high level of abstraction according to the level of knowledge engineering. Qualitative risk analysis methods, such asion according to the level of knowledge engineering. Qualitative risk analysis methods, such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) will be used to analyze the propagation of failures. The second challenge is to trace the high level requirements during the design steps. In order to help the designer to consider safety aspect in the system architecture synthesis, we integrate safety concerns from early design stages, within the MBSE approach. In this paper, we propose a methodology to effectively identify safety conditions, thus to anticipate risks. We also focus our work on the European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS). Finally, we applied specific transformation rules on our ERTMS ontology in order to build a Unified Modeling Language (UML) model.
通过将功能失调分析整合到铁路系统设计中来提高安全性
为了应对日益增加的安全关键型系统设计复杂性,在设计过程中应尽早考虑安全保障问题。然而,使用基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)方法在系统开发过程中带来了关于安全工程和系统设计的内聚集成的新挑战。此外,它有助于预测安全问题并尽快发现错误。铁路系统就是这种情况,它是复杂的社会技术系统。从这个角度来看,本研究的目的是在关键场景定义的基础上形式化安全推理。我们的目标是提出一种主动的方法,在系统架构设计的早期考虑到这些需求。通过确定对建筑设计的影响,我们将通过整合技术设备和人为干预来确保安全。根据相关文献,对初步风险分析(PRA)进行了验证,以确定安全条件。这些安全需求是根据知识工程的层次用高度抽象来表达的。定性的风险分析方法,如根据知识工程的层次。定性风险分析方法,如故障树分析(FTA)将被用于分析故障的传播。第二个挑战是在设计步骤中跟踪高层次的需求。为了帮助设计人员在系统架构综合中考虑安全方面,我们将早期设计阶段的安全问题集成到MBSE方法中。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来有效地识别安全条件,从而预测风险。我们还将工作重点放在欧洲铁路交通管理系统(ERTMS)上。最后,我们在ERTMS本体上应用了特定的转换规则,以构建统一建模语言(UML)模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信