Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan dalam Gugatan Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan: kajian Putusan Nomor 0862/Pdt.G/2015/PA. Pmk

S. Rizal
{"title":"Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan dalam Gugatan Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan: kajian Putusan Nomor 0862/Pdt.G/2015/PA. Pmk","authors":"S. Rizal","doi":"10.33650/AT-TURAS.V6I1.546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze court decisions, in divorce lawsuits that use simple, fast and low-cost judicial principles at the Pamekasan Religious Court. The problems that arise from this study are, First, what is the legal foundation of judge in resolving divorce claims in religious courts using simple, fast and low-cost judicial principles? Second, what are the legal considerations of religious courts in examining, hearing, and deciding divorce cases in religious courts? The research method uses a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that: First, the principle of justice is simple, fast, and low cost refers to Law No. 4 of 2004 concerning Judicial Power article 4 paragraph (2), and article 5 paragraph (2). Also contained in Law No. 7 of 1989 in article 57 paragraph (3), as well as in article 58 paragraph (2). Second: The legal considerations of the extreme religious court in rejecting a divorce lawsuit in a religious court are in accordance with the legal basis of state legislation and syar'i law. Considering, based on the testimonies of the witnesses, that the dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant only happened once, so that it did not meet the criteria of article 19 letter C, namely continuous disputes and arguments so that there was no hope of living in harmony again. Keywords: Judicial Principles, Divorce Lawsuit, Judge's Decision","PeriodicalId":356646,"journal":{"name":"AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33650/AT-TURAS.V6I1.546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze court decisions, in divorce lawsuits that use simple, fast and low-cost judicial principles at the Pamekasan Religious Court. The problems that arise from this study are, First, what is the legal foundation of judge in resolving divorce claims in religious courts using simple, fast and low-cost judicial principles? Second, what are the legal considerations of religious courts in examining, hearing, and deciding divorce cases in religious courts? The research method uses a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that: First, the principle of justice is simple, fast, and low cost refers to Law No. 4 of 2004 concerning Judicial Power article 4 paragraph (2), and article 5 paragraph (2). Also contained in Law No. 7 of 1989 in article 57 paragraph (3), as well as in article 58 paragraph (2). Second: The legal considerations of the extreme religious court in rejecting a divorce lawsuit in a religious court are in accordance with the legal basis of state legislation and syar'i law. Considering, based on the testimonies of the witnesses, that the dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant only happened once, so that it did not meet the criteria of article 19 letter C, namely continuous disputes and arguments so that there was no hope of living in harmony again. Keywords: Judicial Principles, Divorce Lawsuit, Judge's Decision
帕美肯宗教法庭简单、迅速、轻微离婚诉讼的司法原则:裁决编号0862/Pdt /2015/PA。消防员
本研究旨在分析法院判决,在离婚诉讼中使用简单,快速和低成本的司法原则在帕梅卡桑宗教法院。本研究提出的问题是:第一,法官在宗教法院运用简单、快捷、低成本的司法原则解决离婚诉讼的法律依据是什么?第二,宗教法院在审理、审理和裁定宗教法院离婚案件时的法律考量是什么?研究方法采用规范的司法方法。研究结果表明:第一,简单、快捷、低成本的司法原则指的是2004年第4号法关于司法权的第4条第(2)款和第5条第(2)款,1989年第7号法第57条第(3)款和第58条第(2)款。极端宗教法院在宗教法院驳回离婚诉讼的法律考虑是符合国家立法和伊斯兰法的法律依据的。考虑到,根据证人的证词,原告与被告之间的纠纷只发生过一次,因此不符合第十九条C字母的标准,即持续的纠纷和争吵,从而没有希望再次和睦相处。关键词:司法原则;离婚诉讼;法官判决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信