ANCANGAN MODEL KERANGKA TEORI KESANTUNAN YANG EFEKTIF MENGKAJI BUDAYA BAHASA-BAHASA HERITAGE DI ASIA: REVIEW TERHADAP KEUNIVERSALITASAN KERANGKA TEORI KESANTUNAN BROWN & LEVINSON

Abdul Hakim
{"title":"ANCANGAN MODEL KERANGKA TEORI KESANTUNAN YANG EFEKTIF MENGKAJI BUDAYA BAHASA-BAHASA HERITAGE DI ASIA: REVIEW TERHADAP KEUNIVERSALITASAN KERANGKA TEORI KESANTUNAN BROWN & LEVINSON","authors":"Abdul Hakim","doi":"10.26499/LI.V35I2.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article revisits the effectiveness and compatibility of Yassi’s politeness theoretical framework (1996, 2011), adapted from Brown & Levinson’s (1978, 1987, hereafter; B&L) and Scollon & Scollon’s (1995), in studying politeness system of heritage languages in Indonesia and Asia in general. Data, transcription of recorded utterances of some heritage languages in South and West Sulawesi, were analyzed employing Yassi’s framework. The study reveals that B&L’s fails to distinguish a kinship-based interaction from those of non-kinship one. Intimacy on kinship relations, like interaction among brother-sisters denoted different behaviors from those of among friends. The former tended to be asymmetrical  where the elder employed positive politeness and the younger used negative politeness. The latter tended to be symmetrical where all participants tended to employ positive politeness. Similar behavior also denoted by a kinship-based asymmetrical interaction, for instance, interaction among husband-wife-children which is completely different from those of non-kinship one such as interaction between bosses and staff.","PeriodicalId":221379,"journal":{"name":"Linguistik Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistik Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26499/LI.V35I2.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The article revisits the effectiveness and compatibility of Yassi’s politeness theoretical framework (1996, 2011), adapted from Brown & Levinson’s (1978, 1987, hereafter; B&L) and Scollon & Scollon’s (1995), in studying politeness system of heritage languages in Indonesia and Asia in general. Data, transcription of recorded utterances of some heritage languages in South and West Sulawesi, were analyzed employing Yassi’s framework. The study reveals that B&L’s fails to distinguish a kinship-based interaction from those of non-kinship one. Intimacy on kinship relations, like interaction among brother-sisters denoted different behaviors from those of among friends. The former tended to be asymmetrical  where the elder employed positive politeness and the younger used negative politeness. The latter tended to be symmetrical where all participants tended to employ positive politeness. Similar behavior also denoted by a kinship-based asymmetrical interaction, for instance, interaction among husband-wife-children which is completely different from those of non-kinship one such as interaction between bosses and staff.
本文回顾了Yassi的礼貌理论框架(1996,2011)的有效性和兼容性,该框架改编自Brown & Levinson(1978, 1987,下文);B&L)和scollon&scollon(1995)在研究印度尼西亚和亚洲传统语言的礼貌系统方面的研究。采用Yassi的框架对苏拉威西南部和西部一些传统语言的语音记录进行了分析。研究表明,B&L未能区分基于亲属关系的互动与非亲属关系的互动。亲属关系中的亲密关系,如兄弟姐妹之间的互动,与朋友之间的行为是不同的。前者倾向于不对称,老年人使用积极礼貌,年轻人使用消极礼貌。后者倾向于对称,所有参与者都倾向于使用积极的礼貌。类似的行为还表现为基于亲属关系的不对称互动,如夫妻子女之间的互动,这与老板与员工之间的非亲属关系互动完全不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信