{"title":"Home Range and Space Use of Northern Bobwhite Under Two Different Management Models in Southwestern Missouri","authors":"T. R. Thompson, Frank L. Loncarich, R. Hedges","doi":"10.7290/nqsp09hevx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite) management in Missouri, USA has traditionally been focused on providing an interspersion of grass, crop, old field, and woody cover juxtaposed to disked idle areas and food plots to maintain bobwhite populations. This traditional model is implemented with the goal of providing all essential habitat components within 40-acre blocks throughout a larger area used by a population. While this model can produce usable bobwhite space in agriculture-dominated landscapes, it may not be the most effective or efficient approach to producing and maintaining bobwhite in grassland-dominated landscapes. In southwestern Missouri native tallgrass prairie conservation areas are managed primarily with historical ecological processes, such as fire and grazing, to produce the desired patchy habitat mosaic. Additionally, it has been on these native tallgrass prairie conservation areas that managers have seen the most stable and productive bobwhite populations. Over a 5-year period (2014–2018) we quantified movements of northern bobwhite on 3 traditionally managed areas (n = 185) and on 3 managed native tallgrass prairie conservation areas (n = 211) to determine whether home range sizes and space use differed between these two management models. We used the 6-month (Apr–Sep) breeding period to determine core area, home range, mean movement rate, and maximum distance moved. Overall (pooled) home ranges of bobwhite did not differ significantly between traditional and grassland managed areas; however, there were significant yearly differences between management models and study areas. Males generally had larger home range sizes and had higher movement rates than females. For the 5 years of the study few birds made long-distance movements (>1.6 km; 3%), and all remained relatively close to capture locations in winter (Feb–Mar). For both traditional and grassland managed areas, bobwhite selected for areas that had disturbance (fire and grazing) in the last 2 years and for the native grassland vegetation type. These findings suggest that areas managed under the grassland management model provide preferred habitat for bobwhite and could result in significant improvement in habitat quality for tallgrass prairie wildlife. Citation: Thompson, T. R., F. L. Loncarich, and R. K. Hedges. 2022. Home range and space use of northern bobwhite under two different management models in southwestern Missouri. National Quail Symposium Proceedings 9:57. https://doi.org/10.7290/ nqsp09HeVx","PeriodicalId":205881,"journal":{"name":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7290/nqsp09hevx","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite) management in Missouri, USA has traditionally been focused on providing an interspersion of grass, crop, old field, and woody cover juxtaposed to disked idle areas and food plots to maintain bobwhite populations. This traditional model is implemented with the goal of providing all essential habitat components within 40-acre blocks throughout a larger area used by a population. While this model can produce usable bobwhite space in agriculture-dominated landscapes, it may not be the most effective or efficient approach to producing and maintaining bobwhite in grassland-dominated landscapes. In southwestern Missouri native tallgrass prairie conservation areas are managed primarily with historical ecological processes, such as fire and grazing, to produce the desired patchy habitat mosaic. Additionally, it has been on these native tallgrass prairie conservation areas that managers have seen the most stable and productive bobwhite populations. Over a 5-year period (2014–2018) we quantified movements of northern bobwhite on 3 traditionally managed areas (n = 185) and on 3 managed native tallgrass prairie conservation areas (n = 211) to determine whether home range sizes and space use differed between these two management models. We used the 6-month (Apr–Sep) breeding period to determine core area, home range, mean movement rate, and maximum distance moved. Overall (pooled) home ranges of bobwhite did not differ significantly between traditional and grassland managed areas; however, there were significant yearly differences between management models and study areas. Males generally had larger home range sizes and had higher movement rates than females. For the 5 years of the study few birds made long-distance movements (>1.6 km; 3%), and all remained relatively close to capture locations in winter (Feb–Mar). For both traditional and grassland managed areas, bobwhite selected for areas that had disturbance (fire and grazing) in the last 2 years and for the native grassland vegetation type. These findings suggest that areas managed under the grassland management model provide preferred habitat for bobwhite and could result in significant improvement in habitat quality for tallgrass prairie wildlife. Citation: Thompson, T. R., F. L. Loncarich, and R. K. Hedges. 2022. Home range and space use of northern bobwhite under two different management models in southwestern Missouri. National Quail Symposium Proceedings 9:57. https://doi.org/10.7290/ nqsp09HeVx
北山齿鹑;美国密苏里州的山齿鹑(以下简称山齿鹑)管理传统上侧重于提供草地、农作物、老田和树木覆盖,并与圆盘状的闲置区域和食物区并列,以维持山齿鹑的数量。这种传统模式的目标是在人口使用的更大区域内,在40英亩的街区内提供所有必要的栖息地组成部分。虽然这种模式可以在农业为主的景观中产生可用的山齿鹑空间,但它可能不是在草地为主的景观中产生和维持山齿鹑的最有效或最有效的方法。在密苏里州西南部,原生高草草原保护区主要通过历史生态过程进行管理,例如火灾和放牧,以产生理想的斑块状栖息地马赛克。此外,正是在这些原生高草草原保护区,管理人员看到了最稳定、最多产的山齿鹑种群。在5年的时间里(2014-2018),我们量化了3个传统管理区域(n = 185)和3个管理的本地高草草原保护区(n = 211)的北方山齿鹑的活动,以确定这两种管理模式之间的栖息地大小和空间利用是否存在差异。利用6个月(4 - 9月)的繁殖期,确定核心区域、活动范围、平均移动速度和最大移动距离。山齿鹑的总体(集中)活动范围在传统地区和草地管理地区之间没有显著差异;然而,管理模式和研究区域之间存在显著的年度差异。雄性通常比雌性有更大的活动范围和更高的移动率。在5年的研究中,很少有鸟类进行长距离运动(大约1.6公里;(3%),在冬季(2 - 3月)均保持相对靠近捕获地点。对于传统和草地管理区,山齿鹑选择了过去2年受到干扰(火灾和放牧)的地区和原生草地植被类型。这些结果表明,在草原管理模式下的管理区域为山齿鹑提供了良好的栖息地,可以显著改善高草草原野生动物的栖息地质量。引用本文:汤普逊,T. R., F. L. Loncarich, R. K. Hedges, 2022。密苏里州西南部两种不同管理模式下北方山齿鹑的家庭活动范围和空间使用。全国鹌鹑研讨会论文集9:57。https://doi.org/10.7290/ nqsp09HeVx