WELFARE EFFECTS AND IMPORTANCE OF SKILLS AND HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN A DCGE MODEL OF GHANA

K. Bhattarai, E. Okyere
{"title":"WELFARE EFFECTS AND IMPORTANCE OF SKILLS AND HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN A DCGE MODEL OF GHANA","authors":"K. Bhattarai, E. Okyere","doi":"10.47509/jdef.2023.v04i01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a 2012 Ghanaian social accounting matrix, it was determined how different leisure levels and labour endowments affect household welfare and sectoral output. The findings of the leisure experiments point to a pattern in which the wellbeing of wealthiest households are negatively impacted. On the other hand, all other households see an increase in their welfare with rural farmer head savannah (hh01) always seeing the highest each time. Clearly there are redistribution impacts of leisure labour choice through income and substitution effects. When leisure is reduced in an effort to increase productivity, these rich households see a decrease in their consumption levels and the relatively poorer households see an increase in their welfare. So the question then is how can policy makers make such rich households contribute more to national development through income distributional effects by enhancement in their efficiency. Similar effects are noted when endowments change. Outputs in sectors increases. Some household save, spend more on health and education whiles others spend more consumption, specially on imported goods. The income gap between affluent and poor households is reduced when leisure is reduced (productivity is increased), but the income gap is increased when endowments are increased. The question is, “How might policymakers encourage measures that will boost economic happiness and satisfaction for both wealthy and disadvantaged households?” Rawalsian versus Benthamite notions of utility should be considered while setting policy options to achieve the aim of the MDGs.","PeriodicalId":441554,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS AND FINANCE","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS AND FINANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47509/jdef.2023.v04i01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a 2012 Ghanaian social accounting matrix, it was determined how different leisure levels and labour endowments affect household welfare and sectoral output. The findings of the leisure experiments point to a pattern in which the wellbeing of wealthiest households are negatively impacted. On the other hand, all other households see an increase in their welfare with rural farmer head savannah (hh01) always seeing the highest each time. Clearly there are redistribution impacts of leisure labour choice through income and substitution effects. When leisure is reduced in an effort to increase productivity, these rich households see a decrease in their consumption levels and the relatively poorer households see an increase in their welfare. So the question then is how can policy makers make such rich households contribute more to national development through income distributional effects by enhancement in their efficiency. Similar effects are noted when endowments change. Outputs in sectors increases. Some household save, spend more on health and education whiles others spend more consumption, specially on imported goods. The income gap between affluent and poor households is reduced when leisure is reduced (productivity is increased), but the income gap is increased when endowments are increased. The question is, “How might policymakers encourage measures that will boost economic happiness and satisfaction for both wealthy and disadvantaged households?” Rawalsian versus Benthamite notions of utility should be considered while setting policy options to achieve the aim of the MDGs.
福利效应和技能和人力资本发展政策的重要性在加纳的一个城市模型
基于2012年加纳社会核算矩阵,确定了不同的休闲水平和劳动力禀赋如何影响家庭福利和部门产出。休闲实验的结果指出了一种模式,即最富裕家庭的幸福受到负面影响。另一方面,所有其他家庭的福利都有所增加,其中农民头草原(hh01)每次都是最高的。显然,休闲劳动力选择通过收入和替代效应存在再分配影响。当为了提高生产率而减少闲暇时间时,这些富裕家庭的消费水平就会下降,而相对贫穷的家庭的福利就会增加。因此,问题是政策制定者如何通过提高收入分配效率,让这些富裕家庭为国家发展做出更大贡献。当禀赋发生变化时,也会出现类似的效果。部门产出增加。一些家庭储蓄,在医疗和教育上花费更多,而另一些家庭则增加消费,特别是在进口商品上。当闲暇时间减少(生产力增加)时,富裕家庭和贫困家庭之间的收入差距会缩小,但当禀赋增加时,收入差距会增加。问题是,“政策制定者如何鼓励采取措施,提高富裕家庭和贫困家庭的经济幸福感和满意度?”在制定实现千年发展目标的政策选择时,应考虑拉瓦尔式与边沁式的效用概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信