Investigating COVID-19 Tracing Apps as e-Government Service in European Context

Marlon Freire, Jordana Casarin
{"title":"Investigating COVID-19 Tracing Apps as e-Government Service in European Context","authors":"Marlon Freire, Jordana Casarin","doi":"10.1145/3494193.3494253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to identify which European countries have been developed applications as an e-government service to control the COVID-19 pandemic. As a starting point, we use official data from the European Council to map countries that have at some point implemented or developed applications to combat the pandemic. In addition, we have identified the main functionalities and categories of the applications in contact tracking, medical reports, self-diagnosis, health information, exposure detection, quarantine application, route tracking, scientific and educational research. The methodology is based on an exploratory study, providing a qualitative method of analysis. First, we analyse whether applications are available for download on official websites as well as whether they are present on government social networks and, in addition, identifying the origin of applications categorized as government, private or multi-stakeholders. We concluded that 63% of developed applications are in the category of ' contact tracking ', followed by' medical report 'which corresponds to 15%. However, the category 'root tracking' corresponds to only 2% due to the data protection implications of the users. Thus, we found that although most applications had government support in their elaboration, they were not available for download on the official websites, so that, in the context of this investigation, they could not be considered as an e-government tools, and that data protection and privacy has had a negative impact on the development of this kind of solution, which implies the limitation of the applications functionalities. © 2021 ACM.","PeriodicalId":360191,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to identify which European countries have been developed applications as an e-government service to control the COVID-19 pandemic. As a starting point, we use official data from the European Council to map countries that have at some point implemented or developed applications to combat the pandemic. In addition, we have identified the main functionalities and categories of the applications in contact tracking, medical reports, self-diagnosis, health information, exposure detection, quarantine application, route tracking, scientific and educational research. The methodology is based on an exploratory study, providing a qualitative method of analysis. First, we analyse whether applications are available for download on official websites as well as whether they are present on government social networks and, in addition, identifying the origin of applications categorized as government, private or multi-stakeholders. We concluded that 63% of developed applications are in the category of ' contact tracking ', followed by' medical report 'which corresponds to 15%. However, the category 'root tracking' corresponds to only 2% due to the data protection implications of the users. Thus, we found that although most applications had government support in their elaboration, they were not available for download on the official websites, so that, in the context of this investigation, they could not be considered as an e-government tools, and that data protection and privacy has had a negative impact on the development of this kind of solution, which implies the limitation of the applications functionalities. © 2021 ACM.
在欧洲背景下调查COVID-19追踪应用程序作为电子政务服务
本文旨在确定哪些欧洲国家已经开发了应用程序作为电子政务服务来控制COVID-19大流行。作为起点,我们使用欧洲理事会的官方数据来绘制在某种程度上实施或开发了应用程序以对抗大流行病的国家地图。此外,我们还确定了接触者跟踪、医疗报告、自我诊断、健康信息、暴露检测、检疫应用、路线跟踪、科教研究等方面的主要功能和应用类别。该方法基于探索性研究,提供定性分析方法。首先,我们分析应用程序是否可以在官方网站上下载,以及它们是否出现在政府社交网络上,此外,确定应用程序的来源,分类为政府,私人或多方利益相关者。我们得出的结论是,63%的已开发应用程序属于“接触跟踪”类别,其次是“医疗报告”,对应于15%。然而,由于用户的数据保护影响,“根跟踪”类别仅对应2%。因此,我们发现,虽然大多数应用程序在开发过程中得到了政府的支持,但它们并没有在官方网站上下载,因此,在本调查的背景下,它们不能被视为电子政务工具,并且数据保护和隐私对这种解决方案的发展产生了负面影响,这意味着应用程序功能的局限性。©2021 acm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信