A Conceptual Framework for Object-oriented Design Assessment

C. Serban
{"title":"A Conceptual Framework for Object-oriented Design Assessment","authors":"C. Serban","doi":"10.1109/EMS.2010.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays software systems have a continuous evolution, being enhanced, modified and adopted to new requirements. The code becomes more and more complex and drifts away from its original design. One of the first steps in maintaining an object-oriented system is to assess its design, repeatedly throughout the system development lifecycle. Early identification of those parts of the system that need to be reviewed, ensures a more stable design of the successive versions, hindering errors propagation. The main objective of this research is to define a conceptual framework concerning object-oriented design (OOD) assessment. The proposed evaluation methodology is based on metrics and uses fuzzy analysis for the interpretation of the obtained measurement results. This work could pave the way for providing a complex evaluation methodology through the four layers of abstraction: a meta-model for OOD assessment, defined in a standard terminology and formalism using algebraic knowledge, a library of OOD metrics definitions, setting the assessment objectives and a method for the assessment results interpretation. Furthermore, the proposed model is general and scalable and allows other properties and interactions to be added.","PeriodicalId":161746,"journal":{"name":"2010 Fourth UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Fourth UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2010.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Nowadays software systems have a continuous evolution, being enhanced, modified and adopted to new requirements. The code becomes more and more complex and drifts away from its original design. One of the first steps in maintaining an object-oriented system is to assess its design, repeatedly throughout the system development lifecycle. Early identification of those parts of the system that need to be reviewed, ensures a more stable design of the successive versions, hindering errors propagation. The main objective of this research is to define a conceptual framework concerning object-oriented design (OOD) assessment. The proposed evaluation methodology is based on metrics and uses fuzzy analysis for the interpretation of the obtained measurement results. This work could pave the way for providing a complex evaluation methodology through the four layers of abstraction: a meta-model for OOD assessment, defined in a standard terminology and formalism using algebraic knowledge, a library of OOD metrics definitions, setting the assessment objectives and a method for the assessment results interpretation. Furthermore, the proposed model is general and scalable and allows other properties and interactions to be added.
面向对象设计评估的概念框架
如今的软件系统有一个持续的发展,被增强、修改和采用以适应新的需求。代码变得越来越复杂,偏离了最初的设计。维护面向对象系统的第一步是在整个系统开发生命周期中反复评估其设计。早期识别系统中需要检查的部分,可以确保后续版本的设计更稳定,从而阻止错误的传播。本研究的主要目的是定义一个面向对象设计(OOD)评估的概念框架。所提出的评价方法是基于度量,并使用模糊分析来解释所获得的测量结果。这项工作可以通过四个抽象层为提供复杂的评估方法铺平道路:OOD评估的元模型,用标准术语和代数知识的形式化定义,OOD度量定义库,设定评估目标和评估结果解释的方法。此外,建议的模型是通用的和可伸缩的,并允许添加其他属性和交互。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信