Change in perception regarding the use of Biometric devices at a tertiary care hospital in view of COVID-19

S. Garg, A. Achra, Narendra Tiwary, K. Nirmal, Stuti Arora, Anuradha Shulania, N. Duggal
{"title":"Change in perception regarding the use of Biometric devices at a tertiary care hospital in view of COVID-19","authors":"S. Garg, A. Achra, Narendra Tiwary, K. Nirmal, Stuti Arora, Anuradha Shulania, N. Duggal","doi":"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_3_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fingerprint biometric systems are used to identify personnel, grant authorised access and maintain attendance of staff at most places. Despite their many benefits, biometric devices are potential sources of transmission due to contamination from multiple touches by various users. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been massive shift in infection control practices specially hand hygiene. This study was conducted to understand the attitude and practices of healthcare workers (HCWs) they are likely to follow when biometric devices come to use again. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using a self-designed questionnaire given to HCWs in different departments of the hospital in the form of a written form by our infection control nurses. The study was conducted for 5 days. The questionnaire was based on various attitudes and practices before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Results: Overall 304 participants filled the questionnaire, which comprised 85 (28%) doctors, 117 (38.4%) nurses and 102 (33.6%) other staff. Before the emergence of COVID-19, 114 (37.5%) participants felt touching biometric devices is more dangerous than touching other common items such as doorknobs, elevator buttons, countertops and staircase railings which now increased to 183 (60.2%) after the COVID-19. Earlier 77% of participants felt that hand sanitisers should be installed near biometric devices, but now 95.7% feel the need of hand sanitisers near the biometric devices and want to use them. Conclusion: This improvement in hand hygiene might be a result of increased awareness through educational programmes and mass media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hand sanitisers should be installed near biometric devices before restarting their use which will reduce the risk of contamination of biometric devices by pathogenic organisms.","PeriodicalId":310565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_3_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fingerprint biometric systems are used to identify personnel, grant authorised access and maintain attendance of staff at most places. Despite their many benefits, biometric devices are potential sources of transmission due to contamination from multiple touches by various users. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been massive shift in infection control practices specially hand hygiene. This study was conducted to understand the attitude and practices of healthcare workers (HCWs) they are likely to follow when biometric devices come to use again. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using a self-designed questionnaire given to HCWs in different departments of the hospital in the form of a written form by our infection control nurses. The study was conducted for 5 days. The questionnaire was based on various attitudes and practices before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Results: Overall 304 participants filled the questionnaire, which comprised 85 (28%) doctors, 117 (38.4%) nurses and 102 (33.6%) other staff. Before the emergence of COVID-19, 114 (37.5%) participants felt touching biometric devices is more dangerous than touching other common items such as doorknobs, elevator buttons, countertops and staircase railings which now increased to 183 (60.2%) after the COVID-19. Earlier 77% of participants felt that hand sanitisers should be installed near biometric devices, but now 95.7% feel the need of hand sanitisers near the biometric devices and want to use them. Conclusion: This improvement in hand hygiene might be a result of increased awareness through educational programmes and mass media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hand sanitisers should be installed near biometric devices before restarting their use which will reduce the risk of contamination of biometric devices by pathogenic organisms.
鉴于COVID-19,三级保健医院对生物识别设备使用的看法发生了变化
背景:在大多数地方,指纹生物识别系统用于识别人员,授予授权进入和维持员工出勤。尽管生物识别设备有很多好处,但由于不同用户的多次接触造成的污染,它们是潜在的传播源。由于COVID-19大流行,感染控制措施发生了巨大变化,特别是手部卫生。本研究旨在了解医护人员(HCWs)在再次使用生物识别设备时可能采取的态度和做法。材料与方法:采用自行设计的调查问卷,由我院感染控制护士以书面形式对医院各科室的卫生保健工作者进行问卷调查。研究为期5天。该问卷基于疫情前后的各种态度和做法。结果:共304人填写问卷,其中医生85人(28%),护士117人(38.4%),其他工作人员102人(33.6%)。在新冠肺炎出现之前,114名(37.5%)参与者认为触摸生物识别设备比触摸门把手、电梯按钮、台面和楼梯栏杆等其他常见物品更危险,而在新冠肺炎出现后,这一数字增加到183名(60.2%)。之前77%的参与者认为生物识别设备附近应该安装洗手液,但现在95.7%的参与者认为生物识别设备附近需要洗手液并希望使用它们。结论:手卫生的改善可能是在COVID-19大流行期间通过教育计划和大众媒体提高意识的结果。在重新使用生物识别设备之前,应在其附近安装洗手液,这将减少生物识别设备被病原微生物污染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信