Water Relations, Growth, and Yield of Processing Tomatoes Under Partial Rootzone Drying

J. Zegbe-Domínguez, M. H. Behboudian, A. Lang, B. Clothier
{"title":"Water Relations, Growth, and Yield of Processing Tomatoes Under Partial Rootzone Drying","authors":"J. Zegbe-Domínguez, M. H. Behboudian, A. Lang, B. Clothier","doi":"10.1300/J068v09n02_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Water for irrigation is limited worldwide. Therefore water saving practices will have to be adopted. This experiment was carried out to compare deficit irrigation (DI) with partial rootzone drying (PRD) for their effects on the processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cv. Petopride. The treatments were: full watering of both sides of the root system (RS) at each irrigation as control (C), half of irrigation water in C divided equally to both sides of the RS with each watering (DI), and half of irrigation water in C given only to one side of the RS with each irrigation (PRD). Photosynthetic rate, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential were measured on five occasions, and were found to be the same among treatments. Total fruit fresh mass was lower in DI and PRD than in C, but total fruit dry mass was the same among treatments. Irrigation use efficiency was higher in DI and PRD than in C. Vegetative fresh mass was not affected by treatment. However, compared with C plants, vegetative dry mass was higher in DI and PRD plants. Percentage of dry mass allocated into roots was the same among treatments, but a higher allocation was into stems and leaves in DI and PRD plants than in C plants. This was the opposite for the fruit. Total fruit fresh mass was affected by the quantity of irrigation water applied, but not by the volume of soil wetted. Both DI and PRD treatments were found to be feasible water-saving practices for ‘Petopride’.","PeriodicalId":169819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J068v09n02_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

ABSTRACT Water for irrigation is limited worldwide. Therefore water saving practices will have to be adopted. This experiment was carried out to compare deficit irrigation (DI) with partial rootzone drying (PRD) for their effects on the processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cv. Petopride. The treatments were: full watering of both sides of the root system (RS) at each irrigation as control (C), half of irrigation water in C divided equally to both sides of the RS with each watering (DI), and half of irrigation water in C given only to one side of the RS with each irrigation (PRD). Photosynthetic rate, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential were measured on five occasions, and were found to be the same among treatments. Total fruit fresh mass was lower in DI and PRD than in C, but total fruit dry mass was the same among treatments. Irrigation use efficiency was higher in DI and PRD than in C. Vegetative fresh mass was not affected by treatment. However, compared with C plants, vegetative dry mass was higher in DI and PRD plants. Percentage of dry mass allocated into roots was the same among treatments, but a higher allocation was into stems and leaves in DI and PRD plants than in C plants. This was the opposite for the fruit. Total fruit fresh mass was affected by the quantity of irrigation water applied, but not by the volume of soil wetted. Both DI and PRD treatments were found to be feasible water-saving practices for ‘Petopride’.
部分根区干燥条件下加工番茄的水分关系、生长和产量
灌溉用水在世界范围内是有限的。因此,必须采取节水措施。本试验比较了亏缺灌溉(DI)和部分根区干燥(PRD)对番茄(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)加工的影响。Petopride。各处理分别为:每次灌水时将根系两侧全部灌水作为对照(C),每次灌水时将C区灌溉水的一半均匀分配给根系两侧(DI),每次灌水时将C区灌溉水的一半只分配给根系一侧(PRD)。光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度和叶片水势进行了5次测定,结果表明各处理间的光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度和叶片水势是相同的。DI和PRD处理的果实总新鲜质量低于C处理,但各处理的果实总干质量相同。DI和PRD处理的灌溉利用效率高于c处理。但与C植物相比,DI和PRD植物的营养干质量更高。各处理间分配给根系的干质量比例相同,但DI和PRD分配给茎和叶的干质量比例高于C处理。水果的情况正好相反。果实总鲜质量受灌溉水量的影响,而不受土壤湿润量的影响。对“Petopride”来说,DI和PRD处理都是可行的节水方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信