Steadying the swinging pendulum – how might we accommodate competing approaches to public service delivery?

Nigel R. Ball
{"title":"Steadying the swinging pendulum – how might we accommodate competing approaches to public service delivery?","authors":"Nigel R. Ball","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv177tgp0.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reflects on the challenge of accommodating competing approaches to public service delivery. Discourse around the social determinants of health is skewed towards the parts of the population whose adverse social circumstances harm their health the most. Local authorities are much closer to the complexities of service delivery than central government departments, and thus have an instrumental role to play in efforts to support these groups. They do not play this role alone — it is shared with other local delivery agencies, such as Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships in the National Health Service (NHS), as well as private providers and local community groups. There has always been much debate around what role each of these actors should play, and how they might interact with one another so as to create masterful theatre rather than a depressing farce. This question continues to be the focus of much policymaking, experimentation, and debate. The chapter then considers the West London Zone for Children and Young People, a cross-sector delivery partnership. It also explores some of the intersecting themes across other efforts, drawing on research from the Government Outcomes Lab.","PeriodicalId":442386,"journal":{"name":"Local Authorities and the Social Determinants of Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Authorities and the Social Determinants of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv177tgp0.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the challenge of accommodating competing approaches to public service delivery. Discourse around the social determinants of health is skewed towards the parts of the population whose adverse social circumstances harm their health the most. Local authorities are much closer to the complexities of service delivery than central government departments, and thus have an instrumental role to play in efforts to support these groups. They do not play this role alone — it is shared with other local delivery agencies, such as Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships in the National Health Service (NHS), as well as private providers and local community groups. There has always been much debate around what role each of these actors should play, and how they might interact with one another so as to create masterful theatre rather than a depressing farce. This question continues to be the focus of much policymaking, experimentation, and debate. The chapter then considers the West London Zone for Children and Young People, a cross-sector delivery partnership. It also explores some of the intersecting themes across other efforts, drawing on research from the Government Outcomes Lab.
稳定摇摆的钟摆-我们如何容纳提供公共服务的竞争方法?
这一章反映了在提供公共服务的过程中适应相互竞争的方法所面临的挑战。关于健康的社会决定因素的讨论偏向于那些不利的社会环境对其健康危害最大的人群。地方当局比中央政府部门更了解服务提供的复杂性,因此在支持这些群体的努力中可以发挥重要作用。它们并不是单独发挥这一作用,而是与其他地方提供服务的机构,如国家卫生服务体系(NHS)的可持续性和转型伙伴关系,以及私人提供者和地方社区团体共同发挥这一作用。关于这些演员应该扮演什么角色,以及他们如何相互作用,以创造出精湛的戏剧而不是令人沮丧的闹剧,一直存在很多争论。这个问题仍然是许多政策制定、实验和辩论的焦点。然后,本章考虑了西伦敦儿童和青少年区,这是一个跨部门的交付伙伴关系。它还探讨了其他工作中的一些交叉主题,借鉴了政府成果实验室的研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信