Did that professional education about mental health promotion make any difference?: Early childhood educators' reflections upon changes in their knowledge and practices

H. Askell‐Williams, R. Murray‐Harvey
{"title":"Did that professional education about mental health promotion make any difference?: Early childhood educators' reflections upon changes in their knowledge and practices","authors":"H. Askell‐Williams, R. Murray‐Harvey","doi":"10.1017/JGC.2013.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educators are at the heart of educational reforms, such as the introduction of mental health promotion initiatives into early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings. Good quality implementation of reforms requires educators to engage in high quality professional learning: If educators have not had opportunities to gain appropriate knowledge and expertise, new initiatives may be poorly implemented and may consequently achieve limited outcomes. This article reports ECEC educators' perspectives about the impact on their knowledge and practices of the professional education component of the KidsMatter mental health promotion initiative. Educators from 111 ECEC services across Australia contributed a range of types of data, including questionnaires about their knowledge and self-efficacy, feedback about each professional education session, and photo stories about their changed professional practices. Participants indicated that their professional learning led to changed practices in areas such as interpreting children's behaviours, interacting with children, approaching parents, and collaborating with colleagues. Participants' photo stories illustrate how professional education that focuses on content, active learning, coherence, and collaboration can positively influence knowledge and practices. However, if such gains are to last beyond relatively highly resourced start-up phases of initiatives, professional education needs to integrate with, and draw from, the ongoing availability of other professionals such as guidance and counselling staff, who have complementary knowledge and expertise; be recognised and embedded as a core component of ECEC educators' roles and their workplace practices; and be culturally and contextually situated. Staff accounts of the impact of their professional learning on their practices can highlight to policymakers the practical outcomes of strong investments in professional education. Awareness by other professions of the affordances and constraints faced by ECEC educators may contribute to interdisciplinary synergies among the range of professions involved in mental health promotion in educational settings.","PeriodicalId":102318,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/JGC.2013.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Educators are at the heart of educational reforms, such as the introduction of mental health promotion initiatives into early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings. Good quality implementation of reforms requires educators to engage in high quality professional learning: If educators have not had opportunities to gain appropriate knowledge and expertise, new initiatives may be poorly implemented and may consequently achieve limited outcomes. This article reports ECEC educators' perspectives about the impact on their knowledge and practices of the professional education component of the KidsMatter mental health promotion initiative. Educators from 111 ECEC services across Australia contributed a range of types of data, including questionnaires about their knowledge and self-efficacy, feedback about each professional education session, and photo stories about their changed professional practices. Participants indicated that their professional learning led to changed practices in areas such as interpreting children's behaviours, interacting with children, approaching parents, and collaborating with colleagues. Participants' photo stories illustrate how professional education that focuses on content, active learning, coherence, and collaboration can positively influence knowledge and practices. However, if such gains are to last beyond relatively highly resourced start-up phases of initiatives, professional education needs to integrate with, and draw from, the ongoing availability of other professionals such as guidance and counselling staff, who have complementary knowledge and expertise; be recognised and embedded as a core component of ECEC educators' roles and their workplace practices; and be culturally and contextually situated. Staff accounts of the impact of their professional learning on their practices can highlight to policymakers the practical outcomes of strong investments in professional education. Awareness by other professions of the affordances and constraints faced by ECEC educators may contribute to interdisciplinary synergies among the range of professions involved in mental health promotion in educational settings.
关于心理健康促进的专业教育有效果吗?:幼儿教育工作者对其知识和实践变化的思考
教育工作者是教育改革的核心,例如在幼儿教育和照料环境中引入促进心理健康的举措。改革的高质量实施要求教育工作者参与高质量的专业学习:如果教育工作者没有机会获得适当的知识和专业知识,新举措可能实施不力,结果可能有限。这篇文章报道了ECEC教育工作者对“儿童重要”心理健康促进倡议的专业教育部分对他们的知识和实践的影响的观点。来自澳大利亚111个ECEC服务机构的教育工作者提供了一系列类型的数据,包括关于他们的知识和自我效能的问卷调查,关于每次专业教育课程的反馈,以及关于他们改变专业实践的照片故事。参与者表示,他们的专业学习改变了他们在解读儿童行为、与儿童互动、与父母接触以及与同事合作等方面的做法。参与者的照片故事说明了专注于内容、主动学习、一致性和协作的专业教育如何对知识和实践产生积极影响。但是,如果要在资源相对丰富的倡议开办阶段之后继续取得这种成果,专业教育就必须结合并利用现有的其他专业人员,例如具有补充知识和专门知识的指导和咨询工作人员;作为ECEC教育工作者角色和工作实践的核心组成部分得到认可和嵌入;并在文化和语境中定位。工作人员对其专业学习对其实践的影响的描述可以向政策制定者强调对专业教育进行大力投资的实际成果。其他专业对心理健康教育工作者所面临的便利和限制的认识,可能有助于在教育环境中促进心理健康的各种专业之间产生跨学科的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信