Advancing Autonomy in Aviation: A Holistic Approach

Stephen Cook, Anna Dietrich, L. Hook, W. Ryan, David M. Stevens
{"title":"Advancing Autonomy in Aviation: A Holistic Approach","authors":"Stephen Cook, Anna Dietrich, L. Hook, W. Ryan, David M. Stevens","doi":"10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safely implementing increased automation and autonomy in aviation systems offers the promise of improved operational safety, increased air mobility, and economic benefits for millions of people across the globe. However, many technical approaches to autonomy do not follow a holistic approach, taking into account the challenges associated with terminology, certification, fundamental design principles, and current human-centric regulations. Solving challenges in one or some of these areas will not be enough to move aviation into a high level of automation towards future autonomy. For example, even if the technology is available, the regulator must have evidence to know it is safe, and the flying public expects the regulator to certify the aircraft before entrusting their safety to it. Thus, as aviation moves into the age of autonomy, it is essential to have consensus standards that understand the need for a holistic approach to support the safe and effective use of autonomous aircraft. To meet these challenges, in 2017 ASTM International established Task Group AC377 for “Autonomy Design and Operations in Aviation.” The AC377 Task Group has the responsibility for harmonizing terminology, certification requirements constructs, and fundamental autonomy concepts among ASTM aviation committees that produce consensus standards for aviation – F37 for Light Sport Aircraft, F38 for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, F39 for Aircraft Systems, and F44 for General Aviation – with the goal of promoting consistency and transferability in standards relating to aviation autonomy. ASTM AC377 uses a holistic approach to develop guidance materials in the form of technical reports. This paper will discuss the progress to date in addressing these challenges and recommend next steps to close remaining gaps.","PeriodicalId":112045,"journal":{"name":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Safely implementing increased automation and autonomy in aviation systems offers the promise of improved operational safety, increased air mobility, and economic benefits for millions of people across the globe. However, many technical approaches to autonomy do not follow a holistic approach, taking into account the challenges associated with terminology, certification, fundamental design principles, and current human-centric regulations. Solving challenges in one or some of these areas will not be enough to move aviation into a high level of automation towards future autonomy. For example, even if the technology is available, the regulator must have evidence to know it is safe, and the flying public expects the regulator to certify the aircraft before entrusting their safety to it. Thus, as aviation moves into the age of autonomy, it is essential to have consensus standards that understand the need for a holistic approach to support the safe and effective use of autonomous aircraft. To meet these challenges, in 2017 ASTM International established Task Group AC377 for “Autonomy Design and Operations in Aviation.” The AC377 Task Group has the responsibility for harmonizing terminology, certification requirements constructs, and fundamental autonomy concepts among ASTM aviation committees that produce consensus standards for aviation – F37 for Light Sport Aircraft, F38 for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, F39 for Aircraft Systems, and F44 for General Aviation – with the goal of promoting consistency and transferability in standards relating to aviation autonomy. ASTM AC377 uses a holistic approach to develop guidance materials in the form of technical reports. This paper will discuss the progress to date in addressing these challenges and recommend next steps to close remaining gaps.
推进航空自主:一种全面的方法
在航空系统中安全实施更多的自动化和自主性,为全球数百万人提供了改善运营安全性、提高空中机动性和经济效益的承诺。然而,考虑到与术语、认证、基本设计原则和当前以人为中心的法规相关的挑战,许多实现自主的技术方法并没有遵循整体方法。解决其中一个或几个领域的挑战不足以使航空进入高度自动化的未来自主。例如,即使技术是可用的,监管机构也必须有证据证明它是安全的,而乘坐飞机的公众希望监管机构在将他们的安全委托给它之前对飞机进行认证。因此,随着航空进入自主时代,有必要达成共识标准,理解需要一种整体方法来支持安全有效地使用自主飞机。为了应对这些挑战,2017年,ASTM国际组织成立了“航空自主设计和操作”任务组AC377。AC377任务组负责协调ASTM航空委员会之间的术语、认证要求结构和基本自治概念,这些委员会制定了航空共识标准——F37用于轻型运动飞机,F38用于无人机系统,F39用于飞机系统,F44用于通用航空——目标是促进与航空自治相关标准的一致性和可转移性。ASTM AC377采用整体方法以技术报告的形式制定指导材料。本文将讨论迄今为止在应对这些挑战方面取得的进展,并就缩小剩余差距的下一步措施提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信