Reliability of Corrective Exercise Specialist Raters Assessing Movement System Impairment Approach Items in Transient Low Back Pain Developers During Prolonged Standing

Fatemeh Tabatabaei Molazi, Seyedeh Rahil Mahdian, R. Rajabi, M. Karimizadeh Ardakani
{"title":"Reliability of Corrective Exercise Specialist Raters Assessing Movement System Impairment Approach Items in Transient Low Back Pain Developers During Prolonged Standing","authors":"Fatemeh Tabatabaei Molazi, Seyedeh Rahil Mahdian, R. Rajabi, M. Karimizadeh Ardakani","doi":"10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of corrective exercise specialist raters assessing movement and postural impairments of transient Low Back Pain (LBP) developers during Prolonged Standing Protocol (PSP) which called Pain Developers (PDs). Method and Materials: Twenty-four subjects developing transient LBP during prolonged standing (9males, 15females) between 17-85 years of age, were examined by 2 corrective exercise specialists. In order to control the effect of repeated testing on intra-rater reliability, both raters assessed the subjects at the same time. To assess inter-rater reliability, one of the raters assessed the subjects one week later. Examination findings were recorded independently, without discussion. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were indexed by the percent of agreement and kappa coefficient. Findings: Overall, the kappa values for intra- and inter-rater reliability of the items ranged from 0.12 - 0.86 and 62.5 - 1.00, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate these clinical test items as a reliable tool for corrective exercise specialists. They can reliably utilize these test items for identification of movement and alignment impairments that need to be modified in order to prevent the onset of LBP in in healthy-back PDs.","PeriodicalId":122814,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of corrective exercise specialist raters assessing movement and postural impairments of transient Low Back Pain (LBP) developers during Prolonged Standing Protocol (PSP) which called Pain Developers (PDs). Method and Materials: Twenty-four subjects developing transient LBP during prolonged standing (9males, 15females) between 17-85 years of age, were examined by 2 corrective exercise specialists. In order to control the effect of repeated testing on intra-rater reliability, both raters assessed the subjects at the same time. To assess inter-rater reliability, one of the raters assessed the subjects one week later. Examination findings were recorded independently, without discussion. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were indexed by the percent of agreement and kappa coefficient. Findings: Overall, the kappa values for intra- and inter-rater reliability of the items ranged from 0.12 - 0.86 and 62.5 - 1.00, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate these clinical test items as a reliable tool for corrective exercise specialists. They can reliably utilize these test items for identification of movement and alignment impairments that need to be modified in order to prevent the onset of LBP in in healthy-back PDs.
矫正运动专家评估长时间站立时短暂性腰痛患者运动系统损伤方法项目的可靠性
本研究的目的是检验矫正运动专家评分者在长时间站立治疗(PSP)期间评估短暂性腰痛(LBP)患者的运动和姿势障碍时的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性。方法与材料:由2名矫正运动专家对24例17-85岁的长时间站立时发生短暂性腰痛的受试者(男9例,女15例)进行检查。为了控制重复测试对评分者内部信度的影响,两名评分者同时对被试进行评估。为了评估评分者之间的信度,其中一名评分者在一周后对受试者进行了评估。检查结果独立记录,不进行讨论。以一致性百分比和kappa系数来衡量评鉴者间和评鉴者内的信度。结果:总体而言,量表内信度和量表间信度的kappa值分别为0.12 - 0.86和62.5 - 1.00。结论:本研究结果表明,这些临床测试项目是矫正运动专家的可靠工具。他们可以可靠地利用这些测试项目来识别需要修改的运动和对齐障碍,以防止健康背部pd患者发生腰痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信