Accuracy comparison of monthly AIRS, GOSAT and SCIAMACHY data in monitoring atmospheric CH4 concentration

Xiaomin Zhang, Xiuying Zhang, Linjing Zhang, Xinhui Li
{"title":"Accuracy comparison of monthly AIRS, GOSAT and SCIAMACHY data in monitoring atmospheric CH4 concentration","authors":"Xiaomin Zhang, Xiuying Zhang, Linjing Zhang, Xinhui Li","doi":"10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIRS, GOSAT and SCIAMACHY are all very important remote sensors in observing atmospheric CH4 concentrations, and produce different observation data which have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, it is important to decide which atmospheric CH4 production is more agreeable to the surface monitor of CH4 concentrations. Taking the WALIGUAN (China) site for example, correlation analysis on time series between ground-based observation data and the three remotely sensed data showed that CH4 concentrations from the AIRS data had the highest correlation with the WLG ground-based observation data, with the correlation coefficient of 0.503, 0.565, and 0.559 for the CH4 concentration at 160hPa, 260hPa and 360hPa, respectively. The CH4 concentrations from SCIAMACHY and GOSAT had a relatively lower coefficient values with the measured data at WLG, at 0.355 and 0.279, respectively.","PeriodicalId":286908,"journal":{"name":"2013 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AIRS, GOSAT and SCIAMACHY are all very important remote sensors in observing atmospheric CH4 concentrations, and produce different observation data which have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, it is important to decide which atmospheric CH4 production is more agreeable to the surface monitor of CH4 concentrations. Taking the WALIGUAN (China) site for example, correlation analysis on time series between ground-based observation data and the three remotely sensed data showed that CH4 concentrations from the AIRS data had the highest correlation with the WLG ground-based observation data, with the correlation coefficient of 0.503, 0.565, and 0.559 for the CH4 concentration at 160hPa, 260hPa and 360hPa, respectively. The CH4 concentrations from SCIAMACHY and GOSAT had a relatively lower coefficient values with the measured data at WLG, at 0.355 and 0.279, respectively.
AIRS、GOSAT和SCIAMACHY月数据监测大气CH4浓度的精度比较
AIRS、GOSAT和SCIAMACHY都是观测大气CH4浓度的重要遥感器,它们产生的观测数据不同,各有优缺点。因此,确定哪一种大气CH4产量更符合地表CH4浓度监测是很重要的。以WALIGUAN (China)站点为例,对地面观测数据与3个遥感数据的时间序列进行相关分析,结果表明AIRS数据与WLG地面观测数据的CH4浓度相关性最高,在160hPa、260hPa和360hPa的CH4浓度相关系数分别为0.503、0.565和0.559。SCIAMACHY和GOSAT的CH4浓度与WLG实测数据的系数值相对较低,分别为0.355和0.279。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信