Czytankowy heroizm, niewygodny rewizjonizm czy historyczny realizm? O różnych drogach polityki pamięci we współczesnym polskim kinie historycznym — rekonesans
{"title":"Czytankowy heroizm, niewygodny rewizjonizm czy historyczny realizm? O różnych drogach polityki pamięci we współczesnym polskim kinie historycznym — rekonesans","authors":"Piotr Kurpiewski","doi":"10.19195/0867-7441.26.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to reflect on various aspects of memory politics present in contemporary historical cinema. All films depicting the past carry certain theses or thoughts of a political nature meant to strengthen the contemporary discourse on Polish (and not only) history. The paper presents analyses of three sorts of memory politics: pedagogy of pride, pedagogy of shame and visual historiography (historiophoty). The black-and-white heroism referred to as the reading book heroism presented in Caroline (Karolina), History of Roj (Historia Roja), Broken ear of grain (Zerwany kłos) and in The Outcast (Wyklęty) are examples of pedagogy of pride, favoured by the current Polish authorities from the Law and Justice party (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość). Such works as the Oscar-winning Ida, Summer solstice (Letnie przesilenie) and Consent (Zgoda) are, in turn, emanations of the so-called pedagogy of shame and can be seen as a reference to the message of ambiguous masterpieces from the period of the ‘Polish film school’, in particular to the artistic output of Andrzej Munk. A separate place is to be dedicated to historical works by Wojciech Smarzowski, who in Rose (Róża) and Volhynia (Wołyń) consistently creates visually credible tales of history in order to reflect in a general manner on the non-existent world of the past and ordinary people living therein. \nThe main conclusion of the article is the statement that historical politics functioning in films depicting the past is meant to be a temporary intervention which may function in a long-term perspective only, given the high artistic quality of the artwork. Otherwise the movie quickly falls into oblivion and loses its influence on the collective social memory.","PeriodicalId":141509,"journal":{"name":"Literatura i Kultura Popularna","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura i Kultura Popularna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/0867-7441.26.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to reflect on various aspects of memory politics present in contemporary historical cinema. All films depicting the past carry certain theses or thoughts of a political nature meant to strengthen the contemporary discourse on Polish (and not only) history. The paper presents analyses of three sorts of memory politics: pedagogy of pride, pedagogy of shame and visual historiography (historiophoty). The black-and-white heroism referred to as the reading book heroism presented in Caroline (Karolina), History of Roj (Historia Roja), Broken ear of grain (Zerwany kłos) and in The Outcast (Wyklęty) are examples of pedagogy of pride, favoured by the current Polish authorities from the Law and Justice party (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość). Such works as the Oscar-winning Ida, Summer solstice (Letnie przesilenie) and Consent (Zgoda) are, in turn, emanations of the so-called pedagogy of shame and can be seen as a reference to the message of ambiguous masterpieces from the period of the ‘Polish film school’, in particular to the artistic output of Andrzej Munk. A separate place is to be dedicated to historical works by Wojciech Smarzowski, who in Rose (Róża) and Volhynia (Wołyń) consistently creates visually credible tales of history in order to reflect in a general manner on the non-existent world of the past and ordinary people living therein.
The main conclusion of the article is the statement that historical politics functioning in films depicting the past is meant to be a temporary intervention which may function in a long-term perspective only, given the high artistic quality of the artwork. Otherwise the movie quickly falls into oblivion and loses its influence on the collective social memory.
本文旨在反思当代历史电影中存在的记忆政治的各个方面。所有描绘过去的电影都带有某种政治性质的论点或思想,旨在加强对波兰(而不仅仅是)历史的当代论述。本文分析了三种记忆政治学:骄傲教育学、羞耻教育学和视觉历史学(历史学)。《卡洛琳》(Caroline)、《罗伊的历史》(Historia Roja)、《破碎的麦穗》(Zerwany kłos)、《被放逐者》(Wyklęty)等书中被称为读书英雄主义的黑白英雄主义是骄傲教育学的例子,受到波兰法律与正义党(Prawo i Sprawiedliwość)当政当局的青睐。诸如获得奥斯卡奖的《艾达》、《夏至》和《同意》等作品都是所谓的羞耻教育学的体现,可以看作是对“波兰电影学院”时期模棱两可的杰作信息的参考,尤其是对安德烈·蒙克艺术作品的参考。沃伊切赫·斯马佐夫斯基的历史作品将被单独放置在一个地方,他在《玫瑰》(Róża)和《伏利尼亚》(Wołyń)中不断创造视觉上可信的历史故事,以一种普遍的方式反映过去不存在的世界和生活在其中的普通人。这篇文章的主要结论是,历史政治在描绘过去的电影中发挥作用,这意味着一种暂时的干预,可能只在长期的角度起作用,因为艺术作品的艺术质量很高。否则,电影很快就会被遗忘,失去对集体社会记忆的影响。