Effects of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant Properties and Allicin Content of Garlic

Somayyeh Loghmanifar, L. R. Nasiraie, Hamidreza Nouri, Sara Jafarian
{"title":"Effects of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant Properties and Allicin Content of Garlic","authors":"Somayyeh Loghmanifar, L. R. Nasiraie, Hamidreza Nouri, Sara Jafarian","doi":"10.14302/issn.2835-2165.jfsh-20-3487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ever-present need for human communities to extract herbal active ingredients has necessitated many studies to be carried out in order to introduce more efficient and cost-effective extraction processes. The traditional extraction methods are very time consuming and use large volumes of solvents. The large volumes of solvents consumed in such methods not only increase costs but also pose many environmental problems. New extraction methods have been recently introduced to replace the traditional ones. These new methods reduce the volumes of required solvents, shorten the process and increase its efficiency and improve the quality of the products. In this study, the three methods of immersion, boiling, and ultrasound using water/ethanol solvents were employed for garlic extraction and compared with each other in terms of the extraction speed and time, the antioxidant property of the extract, and the quantity of the heat-sensitive active ingredient.\n\nThe results showed that the highest allicin content (0.086%) was observed in the ultrasonic aqueous extract. The largest amounts of phenolic compounds (0.311 mg gallic acid equivalent) were observed in the ultrasonic aqueous extract followed by the aqueous extract prepared after 72 h in a shaking incubator. The highest inhibition rate (50% at 5000 ppm) was that of the ultrasonic aqueous extract and the shaken aqueous extract. Other extracts achieved an inhibition rate of 50% at 8000 ppm. Therefore, ultrasonic extraction can be a good alternative to traditional extraction methods.","PeriodicalId":344960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Hygiene","volume":"64 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2835-2165.jfsh-20-3487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The ever-present need for human communities to extract herbal active ingredients has necessitated many studies to be carried out in order to introduce more efficient and cost-effective extraction processes. The traditional extraction methods are very time consuming and use large volumes of solvents. The large volumes of solvents consumed in such methods not only increase costs but also pose many environmental problems. New extraction methods have been recently introduced to replace the traditional ones. These new methods reduce the volumes of required solvents, shorten the process and increase its efficiency and improve the quality of the products. In this study, the three methods of immersion, boiling, and ultrasound using water/ethanol solvents were employed for garlic extraction and compared with each other in terms of the extraction speed and time, the antioxidant property of the extract, and the quantity of the heat-sensitive active ingredient. The results showed that the highest allicin content (0.086%) was observed in the ultrasonic aqueous extract. The largest amounts of phenolic compounds (0.311 mg gallic acid equivalent) were observed in the ultrasonic aqueous extract followed by the aqueous extract prepared after 72 h in a shaking incubator. The highest inhibition rate (50% at 5000 ppm) was that of the ultrasonic aqueous extract and the shaken aqueous extract. Other extracts achieved an inhibition rate of 50% at 8000 ppm. Therefore, ultrasonic extraction can be a good alternative to traditional extraction methods.
不同提取方法对大蒜抗氧化性能及大蒜素含量的影响
人类社会一直需要提取草药活性成分,因此需要进行许多研究,以引入更有效和更具成本效益的提取工艺。传统的提取方法耗时长、溶剂用量大。在这种方法中消耗的大量溶剂不仅增加了成本,而且造成了许多环境问题。最近出现了新的提取方法来取代传统的提取方法。这些新方法减少了所需溶剂的体积,缩短了过程,提高了效率,提高了产品质量。本研究采用水/乙醇溶剂浸泡、煮沸、超声三种方法对大蒜进行提取,并从提取速度、提取时间、提取物抗氧化性、热敏性活性成分的含量等方面进行比较。结果表明,超声水提液中大蒜素含量最高,为0.086%。超声水提物中酚类化合物含量最高(0.311 mg没食子酸当量),其次是摇培养72 h后制备的水提物。超声波水提液和摇匀水提液的抑菌率最高,在5000ppm时达到50%。其他提取物在8000ppm时的抑制率为50%。因此,超声提取可以很好地替代传统的提取方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信