Gender Equity in the Tax-Transfer System for Fiscal Sustainability

PRN: Race Pub Date : 2015-11-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2817163
P. Apps
{"title":"Gender Equity in the Tax-Transfer System for Fiscal Sustainability","authors":"P. Apps","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2817163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1980s the Australian Personal Income Tax was highly progressive and family payments were universal. The system ranked well in terms of gender equity and female labour supply incentives. During the Howard years the progressivity of the rate scale declined dramatically despite rising inequality in wages, income and wealth, and the individual as the unit of taxation for families was replaced by a system of “quasi-joint” taxation. As a result many partnered mothers as second earners now face effective marginal tax rates that are well above the top rate on personal income. At the same time, many face high child care costs in a largely privatised system. In addition, women, typically on lower pay, cannot gain equally from tax advantaged superannuation. This paper presents an analysis that highlights the counterproductive effects of the gender discrimination in these policies on female labour supply, household saving and the tax base, and argues for policies that promote gender equity for fiscal sustainability in an economy undergoing the far-reaching effects of demographic change.","PeriodicalId":377862,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Race","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In the 1980s the Australian Personal Income Tax was highly progressive and family payments were universal. The system ranked well in terms of gender equity and female labour supply incentives. During the Howard years the progressivity of the rate scale declined dramatically despite rising inequality in wages, income and wealth, and the individual as the unit of taxation for families was replaced by a system of “quasi-joint” taxation. As a result many partnered mothers as second earners now face effective marginal tax rates that are well above the top rate on personal income. At the same time, many face high child care costs in a largely privatised system. In addition, women, typically on lower pay, cannot gain equally from tax advantaged superannuation. This paper presents an analysis that highlights the counterproductive effects of the gender discrimination in these policies on female labour supply, household saving and the tax base, and argues for policies that promote gender equity for fiscal sustainability in an economy undergoing the far-reaching effects of demographic change.
税收转移制度中的性别平等促进财政可持续性
在20世纪80年代,澳大利亚个人所得税是高度累进的,家庭支付是普遍的。该体系在性别平等和女性劳动力供应激励方面排名靠前。在霍华德执政期间,尽管工资、收入和财富的不平等日益加剧,但税率表的累进率却急剧下降,个人作为家庭税收单位的地位被“准联合”税收制度所取代。因此,许多作为第二收入者的已婚母亲现在面临的实际边际税率远高于个人收入的最高税率。与此同时,在一个基本上私有化的体系中,许多人面临着高昂的儿童保育成本。此外,通常收入较低的女性无法从税收优惠的退休金中获得同等的好处。本文提出了一项分析,强调了这些政策中性别歧视对女性劳动力供应、家庭储蓄和税基的反作用,并主张在经历人口变化的深远影响的经济体中,促进性别平等以实现财政可持续性的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信