Comparative Study Of Various Regimens In Alopecia Areata

Bhavesh Mehta, A. Raka, Vinita Bharmbhatt
{"title":"Comparative Study Of Various Regimens In Alopecia Areata","authors":"Bhavesh Mehta, A. Raka, Vinita Bharmbhatt","doi":"10.5580/2a66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: To compare clinical efficacy of liquid phenol (20%), Minoxidil (2 %), and oral minipulse steroid in Alopecia areata.METHOD: A randomized single blind clinical comparative study was undertaken on 51 patients of Alopecia areata .Among which 17 patients were applied liquid phenol (20%) on weekly basis, 17 patients were applied liquid phenol (20%) on weekly basis & asked to apply topical Minoxidil (2%) from second day twice daily, remaining 17 patients were given oral minipulse therapy in the form of Tab. Betamethasone (1 mg) 5 tab on Saturday/Sunday with milk along with weekly liquid phenol (20%). Patients in each group were asked to come for follow up on weekly basis till 3 months. Clinical improvement was assessed in each visit and complications were noted.RESULTS: We observed a clinical improvement of 100% in maximum no. of patients (88.23%) treated with liquid phenol (20%) with oral minipulse steroid while it was only (47.06%) and (52.94 %) in patients treated with liquid phenol (20%) alone & liquid phenol (20%) with Minoxidil (2%)CONCLUSION: As per study, combination therapy of liquid phenol and oral minipulse steroid is better than single agent used alone. Addition of Minoxidil (2%) did not affect the results markedly. Liquid phenol with minipulse steroids is more cost effective than liquid phenol with minoxidil","PeriodicalId":161194,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2a66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

AIM: To compare clinical efficacy of liquid phenol (20%), Minoxidil (2 %), and oral minipulse steroid in Alopecia areata.METHOD: A randomized single blind clinical comparative study was undertaken on 51 patients of Alopecia areata .Among which 17 patients were applied liquid phenol (20%) on weekly basis, 17 patients were applied liquid phenol (20%) on weekly basis & asked to apply topical Minoxidil (2%) from second day twice daily, remaining 17 patients were given oral minipulse therapy in the form of Tab. Betamethasone (1 mg) 5 tab on Saturday/Sunday with milk along with weekly liquid phenol (20%). Patients in each group were asked to come for follow up on weekly basis till 3 months. Clinical improvement was assessed in each visit and complications were noted.RESULTS: We observed a clinical improvement of 100% in maximum no. of patients (88.23%) treated with liquid phenol (20%) with oral minipulse steroid while it was only (47.06%) and (52.94 %) in patients treated with liquid phenol (20%) alone & liquid phenol (20%) with Minoxidil (2%)CONCLUSION: As per study, combination therapy of liquid phenol and oral minipulse steroid is better than single agent used alone. Addition of Minoxidil (2%) did not affect the results markedly. Liquid phenol with minipulse steroids is more cost effective than liquid phenol with minoxidil
不同治疗方案治疗斑秃的比较研究
目的:比较液体苯酚(20%)、米诺地尔(2%)和口服小脉冲类固醇治疗斑秃的临床疗效。方法:对51例斑秃患者进行随机单盲临床比较研究,其中17例患者每周应用液体苯酚(20%),17例患者每周应用液体苯酚(20%),并要求从第2天开始外用米诺地尔(2%),每日2次,其余17例患者以Tab形式口服微脉冲治疗。倍他米松(1毫克)5片,周六/周日与牛奶一起服用,每周服用20%的液体苯酚。两组患者每周随访一次,随访3个月。在每次访问中评估临床改善情况并记录并发症。结果:我们观察到临床改善100%的最大no。液体苯酚(20%)联合口服小脉冲类固醇(88.23%),而液体苯酚(20%)和液体苯酚(20%)联合米诺地尔(2%)分别为(47.06%)和(52.94%)。结论:根据研究,液体苯酚与口服小脉冲类固醇联合治疗优于单药治疗。米诺地尔(2%)的加入对结果无明显影响。液体苯酚与微脉冲类固醇比液体苯酚与米诺地尔更具成本效益
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信