Analysis of Cohesive Devices in Teaching Dialogues

Sri Suningsih, Lidya Ayuni Putri, Winia Waziana
{"title":"Analysis of Cohesive Devices in Teaching Dialogues","authors":"Sri Suningsih, Lidya Ayuni Putri, Winia Waziana","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.220102.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—This study aimed to identify the types of cohesive devices used by the teacher during the teaching-learning process. The data were analyzed using Halliday and Hasan’s theory (1976) taken from the transcript of the English teaching video recorded in the private high school in Lampung. The method applied in this research was a descriptive qualitative method that provides an overview and interpretation of objects in the actual situation. The results of this study show that the most frequent cohesions that appeared in the conversation are reference 30,77%, ellipsis 33,33%, conjunction 23,08 %. Meanwhile, the occurrences of substitution were 5,13%, and lexical cohesion which included reiteration 7,69%, and collocation (0%) in lexical cohesion. In the teaching dialogues, simple sentence is preferred such as giving explanation, instruction, or complaining about something. In addition, omitting words is mostly used than substituting, also more ellipsis than substitution. Discourse cohesion devices used in the teacher conversations include all cohesion except the collocation as Halliday and Hasan stated, here the researcher found that the cohesive devices that were mostly used by the teacher were the ellipsis and references.","PeriodicalId":283536,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220102.045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

—This study aimed to identify the types of cohesive devices used by the teacher during the teaching-learning process. The data were analyzed using Halliday and Hasan’s theory (1976) taken from the transcript of the English teaching video recorded in the private high school in Lampung. The method applied in this research was a descriptive qualitative method that provides an overview and interpretation of objects in the actual situation. The results of this study show that the most frequent cohesions that appeared in the conversation are reference 30,77%, ellipsis 33,33%, conjunction 23,08 %. Meanwhile, the occurrences of substitution were 5,13%, and lexical cohesion which included reiteration 7,69%, and collocation (0%) in lexical cohesion. In the teaching dialogues, simple sentence is preferred such as giving explanation, instruction, or complaining about something. In addition, omitting words is mostly used than substituting, also more ellipsis than substitution. Discourse cohesion devices used in the teacher conversations include all cohesion except the collocation as Halliday and Hasan stated, here the researcher found that the cohesive devices that were mostly used by the teacher were the ellipsis and references.
对话教学中的衔接手段分析
本研究旨在识别教师在教学过程中使用的衔接手段类型。数据分析采用Halliday和Hasan的理论(1976),数据来自楠榜私立高中的英语教学视频记录。本研究采用的方法是描述性定性方法,在实际情况下对对象进行概述和解释。本研究结果表明,在会话中出现频率最高的衔接词是指称30.77%,省略33.33%,连词23.08%。同时,词汇衔接中替换的出现率为5.13%,词汇衔接中重复的出现率为7.69%,搭配的出现率为0%。在教学对话中,以简单句为主,如解释、指导、抱怨等。此外,省略词的使用比替换词多,省略也比替换词多。在教师会话中使用的语篇衔接手段包括了韩礼德和哈桑所说的除了搭配以外的所有衔接手段,在这里研究者发现教师使用最多的衔接手段是省略和指称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信