The Praxis of Relation, Validation, and Motivation: Articulating LIS Collegiality through a CRT Lens

Torie L Quiñonez, Lalitha Nataraj, Antonia P. Olivas
{"title":"The Praxis of Relation, Validation, and Motivation: Articulating LIS Collegiality through a CRT Lens","authors":"Torie L Quiñonez, Lalitha Nataraj, Antonia P. Olivas","doi":"10.7551/MITPRESS/11969.003.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"cal raced/gendered epistemologies are supported by validation theory within a relationalcultural mentoring framework, and how they work to empower both students and librarians to assert their rightful places as scholars and members of a larger academic community. We also borrow from Latina/o Critical Theory (LatCrit), which, in concert with CRT, emerged as a theoretical framework from legal studies, to theorize issues particular to the Latinx identities shared by many of our students, such as language, immigration and citizenship status, and identity. A LatCrit analysis is especially valuable now, in a place and time where students and their families are literally criminalized and targeted for deportation. For ourselves and for our students, the axis of citizenship/legal status intersects with language, class, and phenotype to articulate a specific raced subjectivity that is politically targeted. All of these intersections impact both our worldview and the ways we are perceived by our students and colleagues. We see our professional practice, including teaching, research, and service, in alignment with Solórzano’s five defining elements of CRT in educational research:","PeriodicalId":378977,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Justice","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/MITPRESS/11969.003.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

cal raced/gendered epistemologies are supported by validation theory within a relationalcultural mentoring framework, and how they work to empower both students and librarians to assert their rightful places as scholars and members of a larger academic community. We also borrow from Latina/o Critical Theory (LatCrit), which, in concert with CRT, emerged as a theoretical framework from legal studies, to theorize issues particular to the Latinx identities shared by many of our students, such as language, immigration and citizenship status, and identity. A LatCrit analysis is especially valuable now, in a place and time where students and their families are literally criminalized and targeted for deportation. For ourselves and for our students, the axis of citizenship/legal status intersects with language, class, and phenotype to articulate a specific raced subjectivity that is politically targeted. All of these intersections impact both our worldview and the ways we are perceived by our students and colleagues. We see our professional practice, including teaching, research, and service, in alignment with Solórzano’s five defining elements of CRT in educational research:
关系、验证和动机的实践:通过CRT镜头阐明LIS同僚关系
CAL种族/性别认识论是由关系文化指导框架内的验证理论支持的,以及它们如何使学生和图书馆员都能作为学者和更大的学术团体的成员来维护自己的合法地位。我们还借鉴了拉丁/拉丁批判理论(LatCrit),该理论与CRT一起作为法律研究的理论框架出现,将许多学生共有的拉丁裔身份问题理论化,例如语言,移民和公民身份以及身份。LatCrit的分析现在尤其有价值,因为在这个地方和时代,学生和他们的家人确实被定为犯罪,并成为驱逐出境的目标。对于我们自己和我们的学生来说,公民身份/法律地位的轴线与语言、阶级和表现型相交,以表达一种特定的种族主体性,这是政治目标。所有这些交叉点都影响着我们的世界观以及我们的学生和同事对我们的看法。我们认为我们的专业实践,包括教学,研究和服务,与Solórzano在教育研究中定义CRT的五个要素保持一致:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信