Public policy response to the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic (the second half of 2020) in the Netherlands. Experts' report

Alexander W. Friedrich, L. Curfs
{"title":"Public policy response to the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic (the second half of 2020) in the Netherlands. Experts' report","authors":"Alexander W. Friedrich, L. Curfs","doi":"10.4467/20842627oz.21.003.15275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a previous report we answered a number of questions by the editors about the Dutch strategic policy in the first half year of the SARS-CoV2 crisis. In the present paper we reply to a number of additional questions of the editors about the steps put by the Dutch policy during the second half of 2020, when the SARS-CoV2 and COVID-19 pandemic developed its second wave. Especially, the awareness of an upcoming second and third epidemic waves, the specific preventive actions and measures taken by the government and the changing compliance and trust of the public in the government’s strategy are described. Actions such as the Dutch test strategy, the division of regional vs national competences, partial and complete lockdowns, and cooperation with other member states and the (or their lack) are also briefly treated. Specific temporary and structural adjustments in the public health and health care system are mentioned.\n\nNo hard conclusions or qualifications about the adequacy of the Dutch public health and health care policy are drawn. Nevertheless, in retrospect it is clear that a straightforward, focussed and highly effective strategy in this unprecedented crisis by a new and dangerous and rapidly mutating virus is a great challenge for every country. Many things go well, but many more could or should have be done better. We have to learn, also from each other.","PeriodicalId":139863,"journal":{"name":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20842627oz.21.003.15275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a previous report we answered a number of questions by the editors about the Dutch strategic policy in the first half year of the SARS-CoV2 crisis. In the present paper we reply to a number of additional questions of the editors about the steps put by the Dutch policy during the second half of 2020, when the SARS-CoV2 and COVID-19 pandemic developed its second wave. Especially, the awareness of an upcoming second and third epidemic waves, the specific preventive actions and measures taken by the government and the changing compliance and trust of the public in the government’s strategy are described. Actions such as the Dutch test strategy, the division of regional vs national competences, partial and complete lockdowns, and cooperation with other member states and the (or their lack) are also briefly treated. Specific temporary and structural adjustments in the public health and health care system are mentioned. No hard conclusions or qualifications about the adequacy of the Dutch public health and health care policy are drawn. Nevertheless, in retrospect it is clear that a straightforward, focussed and highly effective strategy in this unprecedented crisis by a new and dangerous and rapidly mutating virus is a great challenge for every country. Many things go well, but many more could or should have be done better. We have to learn, also from each other.
荷兰应对第二波新冠肺炎大流行(2020年下半年)的公共政策专家的报告
在之前的一份报告中,我们回答了编辑们关于荷兰在SARS-CoV2危机上半年的战略政策的一些问题。在本论文中,我们回答了编辑关于荷兰政策在2020年下半年采取的步骤的一些其他问题,当时SARS-CoV2和COVID-19大流行发展了第二波。特别是,对即将到来的第二和第三波流行病的认识,政府采取的具体预防行动和措施,以及公众对政府战略的依从性和信任度的变化进行了描述。还简要介绍了荷兰测试战略、区域与国家能力的划分、部分和完全封锁以及与其他成员国的合作(或缺乏合作)等行动。还提到了公共卫生和卫生保健系统的具体临时性和结构性调整。对于荷兰公共卫生和保健政策的适当性,没有得出确切的结论或限定条件。然而,回顾起来,显然,在一种新的、危险的和迅速变异的病毒造成的这场前所未有的危机中,采取直截了当、重点突出和高度有效的战略对每个国家来说都是一个巨大的挑战。许多事情进展顺利,但更多的事情本可以或本应该做得更好。我们要学习,也要互相学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信