A metrological comparison between different methods for harmonic pollution metering

A. Ferrero, M. Prioli, S. Salicone
{"title":"A metrological comparison between different methods for harmonic pollution metering","authors":"A. Ferrero, M. Prioli, S. Salicone","doi":"10.1109/AMPS.2011.6090434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several proposals can be found, in literature, to split the responsibility for the injection of harmonic pollution between the different loads and between loads and source. The methods have been tested mainly by means of simulations performed on an industrial test system identified by the IEEE Task Force on Harmonic modeling and simulation. The main problem of simulation results is that they tend to disregard measurement uncertainty that, if not properly considered, might lead to an incorrect, or even impossible assessment of responsibility. This paper is therefore aimed at comparing the different available methods from a metrological point of view, in order to provide a wider and more complete basis for evaluating their performances.","PeriodicalId":420824,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMPS.2011.6090434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Several proposals can be found, in literature, to split the responsibility for the injection of harmonic pollution between the different loads and between loads and source. The methods have been tested mainly by means of simulations performed on an industrial test system identified by the IEEE Task Force on Harmonic modeling and simulation. The main problem of simulation results is that they tend to disregard measurement uncertainty that, if not properly considered, might lead to an incorrect, or even impossible assessment of responsibility. This paper is therefore aimed at comparing the different available methods from a metrological point of view, in order to provide a wider and more complete basis for evaluating their performances.
谐波污染计量方法的计量比较
在文献中可以找到一些建议,在不同负荷之间以及负荷和源之间分配谐波污染的注入责任。这些方法主要通过在IEEE谐波建模和仿真工作组确定的工业测试系统上进行的仿真进行了测试。模拟结果的主要问题是,它们倾向于忽视测量的不确定性,如果不适当考虑,可能导致不正确的,甚至不可能的责任评估。因此,本文旨在从计量的角度比较不同的可用方法,以便为评价它们的性能提供更广泛和更完整的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信