Application of Grey Teory Method for Halal Food Risk Assessment Based on the Traceability System in Food Supply Chain
D. Handayani, Haryono, Tri Prihatiningsih
{"title":"Application of Grey Teory Method for Halal Food Risk Assessment Based on the Traceability System in Food Supply Chain","authors":"D. Handayani, Haryono, Tri Prihatiningsih","doi":"10.2991/icoemis-19.2019.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of based halal food. The method that will be used in conducting a risk assessment using the Grey Theory method. There are three risks that need to be considered for fish meatball SME, namely the risk of adding preservative supporting ingredients to meatballs, the risk of contamination with lizard dung, rats, cockroaches. Supporting materials used are not in accordance with the list of ingredients in LPPOM MUI. Therefore fish meatball SME can communicate risk by exchanging information and opinions on food security risks by adopting important mitigation principles, namely control, coherence and coordination. By minimizing the risk of halal food in the SME, the halal guarantee law can be realized to encourage halal industry in Indonesia. Introduction Halal food is a very sensitive issue in Indonesia, which has the population of 255 million people 87.2 percent of whom are Muslims, representing the world's largest Muslim population [1]. Consequently, the halal food producers use the label of halal on their products as a symbol of quality [2], [3] and combine it with the label of thoyyiban which means “safe for consumption” [4]. Therefore, halal products are consumed not only by Muslim customers but also by non-Muslim customers so that the growth of halal products is significant enough, about 18.3 percent of global food expenditures reaching US $ 1,914 billion in 2021. [5] state that Muslim consumers have a high awareness of halal products and avoid the risk of halal products. However, the risk of halal products can occur starting from the origin of raw materials, the way to obtain them, the process of handling the raw materials, the type of material or substance (material), the storage and every stage of the process from raw materials to finished products [6]. Thus, the risk potential may take place along the supply chain points such as raw material risk, production risk, food safety risk, and logistics risk [7]. In general, the risk potentials that occur on halal food products may be in the form of fraud and forgery of halal food, food safety incidents, and contamination of non halal raw ingredients [8],[9],[10] One of the potential risks occurred in 2014 on the cases of Hazelnut and Cadbury circulating in the market that were declared for containing swine DNA [11]. Additionally, in 2001, there was the case of Ajinomoto seasoning that was suspected of mixing its raw ingredients with lard in the manufacturing process. The use of raw ingredients such as pork, alcohol, carcasses, blood, forbidden (haram) animals and improperly slaughtered animals is forbidden even though the percentage of those ingredients is small [12] In another case, [13] mentioned the manipulation of halal labels from MUI for pork containing products which occurred in beef jerky and shredded chicken products available in the society. [13] stated that the products circulating in the society were suspected of coming from the bone and pork skin containing gelatin, shortening and lard. A number of halal problems and scandals that have occurred in recent years on several top brands have shaken the public confidence in the ability of producers and the government to ensure the integrity of the halal labeled products starting from the source, 1st International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System (ICOEMIS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Intelligent Systems Research, volume 173","PeriodicalId":156644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 1st International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System (ICOEMIS 2019)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 1st International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System (ICOEMIS 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icoemis-19.2019.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of based halal food. The method that will be used in conducting a risk assessment using the Grey Theory method. There are three risks that need to be considered for fish meatball SME, namely the risk of adding preservative supporting ingredients to meatballs, the risk of contamination with lizard dung, rats, cockroaches. Supporting materials used are not in accordance with the list of ingredients in LPPOM MUI. Therefore fish meatball SME can communicate risk by exchanging information and opinions on food security risks by adopting important mitigation principles, namely control, coherence and coordination. By minimizing the risk of halal food in the SME, the halal guarantee law can be realized to encourage halal industry in Indonesia. Introduction Halal food is a very sensitive issue in Indonesia, which has the population of 255 million people 87.2 percent of whom are Muslims, representing the world's largest Muslim population [1]. Consequently, the halal food producers use the label of halal on their products as a symbol of quality [2], [3] and combine it with the label of thoyyiban which means “safe for consumption” [4]. Therefore, halal products are consumed not only by Muslim customers but also by non-Muslim customers so that the growth of halal products is significant enough, about 18.3 percent of global food expenditures reaching US $ 1,914 billion in 2021. [5] state that Muslim consumers have a high awareness of halal products and avoid the risk of halal products. However, the risk of halal products can occur starting from the origin of raw materials, the way to obtain them, the process of handling the raw materials, the type of material or substance (material), the storage and every stage of the process from raw materials to finished products [6]. Thus, the risk potential may take place along the supply chain points such as raw material risk, production risk, food safety risk, and logistics risk [7]. In general, the risk potentials that occur on halal food products may be in the form of fraud and forgery of halal food, food safety incidents, and contamination of non halal raw ingredients [8],[9],[10] One of the potential risks occurred in 2014 on the cases of Hazelnut and Cadbury circulating in the market that were declared for containing swine DNA [11]. Additionally, in 2001, there was the case of Ajinomoto seasoning that was suspected of mixing its raw ingredients with lard in the manufacturing process. The use of raw ingredients such as pork, alcohol, carcasses, blood, forbidden (haram) animals and improperly slaughtered animals is forbidden even though the percentage of those ingredients is small [12] In another case, [13] mentioned the manipulation of halal labels from MUI for pork containing products which occurred in beef jerky and shredded chicken products available in the society. [13] stated that the products circulating in the society were suspected of coming from the bone and pork skin containing gelatin, shortening and lard. A number of halal problems and scandals that have occurred in recent years on several top brands have shaken the public confidence in the ability of producers and the government to ensure the integrity of the halal labeled products starting from the source, 1st International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System (ICOEMIS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Intelligent Systems Research, volume 173
灰色理论方法在食品供应链可追溯系统清真食品风险评估中的应用
本研究的目的是评估基于清真食品的风险。使用灰色理论方法进行风险评估的方法。鱼肉丸SME需要考虑三个风险,即在肉丸中添加防腐剂的风险,被蜥蜴粪便、老鼠、蟑螂污染的风险。使用的辅助材料不符合LPPOM MUI的成分清单。因此,中小企业可以通过采用重要的缓解原则,即控制、连贯和协调,就粮食安全风险交换信息和意见,从而进行风险沟通。通过将中小企业的清真食品风险降到最低,可以实现清真保障法,鼓励印尼的清真产业。清真食品在印尼是一个非常敏感的问题,印尼有2.55亿人口,其中87.2%是穆斯林,是世界上穆斯林人口最多的国家[1]。因此,清真食品生产商在其产品上使用清真标签作为质量的象征[2],[3],并将其与“安全消费”的标签相结合[4]。因此,清真产品不仅被穆斯林消费者消费,也被非穆斯林消费者消费,因此清真产品的增长足够显著,约占全球食品支出的18.3%,到2021年达到1.914万亿美元。[5]表明穆斯林消费者对清真产品有较高的认知度,并规避清真产品的风险。然而,清真产品的风险可以从原材料的来源、获取方式、处理原材料的过程、材料或物质(材料)的类型、储存以及从原材料到成品的每一个阶段开始发生[6]。因此,风险潜力可能沿供应链各点发生,如原材料风险、生产风险、食品安全风险、物流风险等[7]。一般来说,清真食品可能存在的潜在风险可能是清真食品的欺诈和伪造、食品安全事件、非清真原料污染等[8]、[9]、[10]。2014年市场上流通的榛子和吉百利被宣布含有猪DNA的案例之一就是潜在风险[11]。此外,2001年,味之素调味料被怀疑在生产过程中将原料与猪油混合。禁止使用猪肉、酒精、尸体、血液、违禁(haram)动物和屠宰不当的动物等原料,即使这些原料的比例很小[12]。在另一个案例中,[13]提到了MUI对含猪肉产品的清真标签的操纵,这种情况发生在牛肉干和鸡丝产品中。[13]指出,社会上流通的产品涉嫌来自含有明胶、起酥油和猪油的猪骨和猪皮。近年来在几个顶级品牌上发生的一些清真问题和丑闻动摇了公众对生产商和政府从源头确保清真标签产品完整性的能力的信心,第一届工业系统工程与管理国际会议(ICOEMIS 2019)版权©2019,作者。亚特兰蒂斯出版社出版。这是一篇基于CC BY-NC许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)的开放获取文章。智能系统研究进展,第173卷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。