{"title":"Histórias de adesões, acomodações e resistências em tempos de ditadura","authors":"Maria José Aviz do Rosário","doi":"10.20396/RHO.V20I0.8655324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends, through the medotology of oral history, to analyze the formation of teachers in the IEP from 1964 to 1985, from the questioning: how the teachers and the students of the IEP understood and lived the formation of teachers in a time of dictatorship? with the purpose of understanding the construction of adhesions, accommodations and resistance to the project of the Brazilian dictatorial state. The results show that the IEP in the period (1964-1982) presents a formative process almost detached from the injunctions of the Brazilian dictatorial state, the marks of accessions and accommodations were expressed through surveillance, behaviors, presence of representatives of the regime in the school space and by purely instrumental disciplines; the history of resistance to the practices of dictatorship only appears in the period (1983-1985), in the redemocratization, with a movement of quite significant resistance, student organization and movement, formation of the student body and the posture of teachers to combat dictatorial practices in which there was no lack of political-ideological conflicts between the field connected to the lefts and the so-called \"representatives\" of the state. In conclusion, the training of teachers in the IEP was permeated by these processes, associated with the education proposal promoted by the Brazilian dictatorial state. In the first years, without questioning, where the accessions and accommodations used as tools of the information processes are observed, and in the last, the resistance, being taken from outside to the institution, promoting another conception of formation.","PeriodicalId":230861,"journal":{"name":"Revista HISTEDBR on line","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista HISTEDBR on line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/RHO.V20I0.8655324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article intends, through the medotology of oral history, to analyze the formation of teachers in the IEP from 1964 to 1985, from the questioning: how the teachers and the students of the IEP understood and lived the formation of teachers in a time of dictatorship? with the purpose of understanding the construction of adhesions, accommodations and resistance to the project of the Brazilian dictatorial state. The results show that the IEP in the period (1964-1982) presents a formative process almost detached from the injunctions of the Brazilian dictatorial state, the marks of accessions and accommodations were expressed through surveillance, behaviors, presence of representatives of the regime in the school space and by purely instrumental disciplines; the history of resistance to the practices of dictatorship only appears in the period (1983-1985), in the redemocratization, with a movement of quite significant resistance, student organization and movement, formation of the student body and the posture of teachers to combat dictatorial practices in which there was no lack of political-ideological conflicts between the field connected to the lefts and the so-called "representatives" of the state. In conclusion, the training of teachers in the IEP was permeated by these processes, associated with the education proposal promoted by the Brazilian dictatorial state. In the first years, without questioning, where the accessions and accommodations used as tools of the information processes are observed, and in the last, the resistance, being taken from outside to the institution, promoting another conception of formation.